| Title |
First, design for data sharing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt.3516 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Wilbanks, Stephen H Friend |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 10% |
| France | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 67% |
| Scientists | 35 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 26% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#148,120
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#291
of 8,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,660
of 319,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#8
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.