RT @GD_Fraser: @NutritionMadeS3 Seriously? This is Relative Risk Reduction, 2/5th of F'All, now compare that damage done by the statins, n…
RT @GD_Fraser: @NutritionMadeS3 Seriously? This is Relative Risk Reduction, 2/5th of F'All, now compare that damage done by the statins, n…
My dear friend @GD_Fraser just nailed it ⬇️
@NutritionMadeS3 Seriously? This is Relative Risk Reduction, 2/5th of F'All, now compare that damage done by the statins, no mention of ACM in the article. Meanwhile cholesterol is essential for health, it's quality not quantity & there's no Pharma ca
@girdley @Mark_Sisson How high are we talking? Don’t let mainstream Drs push pills on you. Unless you already had a ❤️ attack or genetically predisposed to hyperlipidemia… Check this out: https://t.co/OlOq15ZC26
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship https://t.co/tllx1Y9CKT
RT @HumanleyHealth: Why are we told that having a lower cholesterol level is healthier, when the scientific evidence shows this is simply n…
Why are we told that having a lower cholesterol level is healthier, when the scientific evidence shows this is simply not the case? https://t.co/C3eQWg3Jxv https://t.co/vlJeXA9nQV
Total cholesterol and all-cause mortality by sex and age: a prospective cohort study among 12.8 million adults - Scientific Reports https://t.co/k483DWX6aC
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship https://t.co/ALvV9V9Pur
Total cholesterol and all-cause mortality by sex and age: a prospective cohort study among 12.8 million adults - Scientific Reports https://t.co/lSsVJu7Nsk
CAT HACKER: Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship https://t.co/2LVuTohkJF
apparently, if i am reading this right, you should either have really low cholesterol or really high cholesterol to live long? https://t.co/6qQ8soyCB2 https://t.co/PhQyxRzxeY
RT @bartezzini: Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship https://t.co/BlQgIe7mWQ #news #technology #TechnologyNews #in…
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship https://t.co/BlQgIe7mWQ #news #technology #TechnologyNews #infosec #cybersecurity #hacking
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship by via Hacker News Comments https://t.co/PnXdYbmY2u
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship https://t.co/FynXEVfQOl (https://t.co/7CJ9Df881p)
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship Link: https://t.co/NgsWgmmzK6 Comments: https://t.co/jRmFzM0UW8
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship https://t.co/ersp79QmmY (https://t.co/aQDB81T8kN)
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship https://t.co/L5jQIPE0RL
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship: https://t.co/yqoiLCPJGl Comments: https://t.co/B4arqpYF4Z
Cholesterol and mortality: Evidence of a U-shape Relationship L: https://t.co/bAmgGHZTcC C: https://t.co/EfcKp0loeT
Why are we told that having a lower cholesterol level is healthier, when the scientific evidence shows this is simply not the case? https://t.co/YNWhjNWzkq Join the conversation on Telegram: https://t.co/Qy2qHTAnku #cholesterol #fatisyourfriend #keto #p
RT @mike_lustgarten: @reacher46892226 @Mangan150 2019, 12.8 million people: https://t.co/gFMoHtoRfT
@Mangan150 Never mind found it in the comments :D https://t.co/H7HNXvzCqG
@reacher46892226 @Mangan150 2019, 12.8 million people: https://t.co/gFMoHtoRfT
RT @Aeternus_priaro: @vegan__earth göz göre yalan söylüyorsun ya da cahilsin. anlatılan narrative zaten et yememek üzerine kurulu. kolestro…
veganlar açık açık yalan söylüyor inanılmaz bir ortam
@vegan__earth göz göre yalan söylüyorsun ya da cahilsin. anlatılan narrative zaten et yememek üzerine kurulu. kolestrol sebebiyle yumurtanın insanları öldürdüğü yalanı için nasıl özür diledilerse et için de aynı proje güdülüyor. https://t.co/hQJlEXvT2O
@sh0ckto Sorry forgot the link https://t.co/yW8SfMRgSJ
@The_Nutrivore In May 2020 my LDL was 76 associated with the highest NHANES all cause mortality. My LDL of 282, HDL of 75 and triglycerides of 58 is associated with the lowest NHANES all cause mortality. That inverse LDL and mortality relationship is real.
RT @Blagosklonny: 1/2 All studies agree that both too low and too high cholesterol levels are associated with higher mortality: U-shape ass…
RT @Blagosklonny: 1/2 All studies agree that both too low and too high cholesterol levels are associated with higher mortality: U-shape ass…
1/2 All studies agree that both too low and too high cholesterol levels are associated with higher mortality: U-shape association. But they are greatly disagree on the optimal levels https://t.co/q4qcljhLCU
@SiepkaJaniak @GadowskiWitold No to popatrzmy badanie na 13 milionach ludzi pokazuje, że optymalny poziom tego strasznego i złego cholesterolu to ok 220 https://t.co/uA3gdiXXk5
@ladida1958 @Mangan150 https://t.co/XgvScqBOwG. It's a prospective cohort, which is garbage but, 🤷♂️, the vegoons like to think it's real science so we can too.
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
For all those who wig out over total cholesterol numbers
@DanielKelly150 Lowest mortality is above the normal range 🤔 https://t.co/H8I2L9COkS
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
RT @SBakerMD: All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xb…
All cause mortality vs total cholesterol in 12.8 million people (looks like 210-240 is the sweet spot) https://t.co/oXi7xbl5k4 https://t.co/o5whUfwJfq
@Laura32106796 @rejimonv @JEverettLearned I have shared over 5 articles and you have shared none so I think you might want to take your own advice. https://t.co/omkjKJYgJa last one. Read and weep. Higher cholesterol less chance of dying.
@davykevinp @NutritionDanny Not what I want. I want maximum lifetime LDL (or even TC, if LDL is not available) versus all-cause mortality, because that could help reduce the impact of reverse causality. https://t.co/38JeHdmsMp
@fatsia3 @dweisa Ой да их так много, что даже не знаю. Вот например одно из крупнейших исследований: 12 милн человек, 10 лет исследование. Мне кажется убедительней не придумаешь: https://t.co/awEbjiypBR
@MrFlibbleRules @margaritaevna95 The only correlation between LDL and all cause mortality is you live longer with higher LDL. --> Correlation is not causation right? https://t.co/HZTGlcJFSD
@ifixhearts @DrAseemMalhotra If you liked this, you will love the next one: https://t.co/7i5iNJ30b6
While a statin may be for you, it’s at least worth knowing the evidence and making an informed decision about your health. Not Medical Advice https://t.co/fayCzCZxuF
Fiber = ⬇️LDL-C Yes, yes it does (a wee bit). So what? LDL-C isn’t even linearly associated to all-cause mortality risk https://t.co/jm8CTc9zJw Utterly useless in CVD as well https://t.co/1jAJipOkgC Chris, the 1970s would like its (pseudo)science back
@Murtaza_Ramay @JohnConstas Cholesterol for instance. https://t.co/GCs7lWr6Hc. Nature paper showing clear bias from paper making causative inferences between reat meat and cancer. https://t.co/WBghna5lfs
@AscendantLight You want a total of around 210-249 ng/ dL, LDL of.about 140 ng/ dL. https://t.co/GCs7lWIHyK.
RT @alhazzaa_hazzaa: مستوى الكوليستيرول واحتمالات الوفاة الناجمة عن كل الأسباب https://t.co/45b7MKnUQf https://t.co/DAQFOufJj5
RT @alhazzaa_hazzaa: مستوى الكوليستيرول واحتمالات الوفاة الناجمة عن كل الأسباب https://t.co/45b7MKnUQf https://t.co/DAQFOufJj5
For one thing we have the Korea study showing that the lower your total cholesterol the higher your risk for all cause mortality and that optimal total cholesterol is around 225mg/ dL. https://t.co/GCs7lWr6Hc.
RT @alhazzaa_hazzaa: مستوى الكوليستيرول واحتمالات الوفاة الناجمة عن كل الأسباب https://t.co/45b7MKnUQf https://t.co/DAQFOufJj5
RT @alhazzaa_hazzaa: مستوى الكوليستيرول واحتمالات الوفاة الناجمة عن كل الأسباب https://t.co/45b7MKnUQf https://t.co/DAQFOufJj5
RT @alhazzaa_hazzaa: مستوى الكوليستيرول واحتمالات الوفاة الناجمة عن كل الأسباب https://t.co/45b7MKnUQf https://t.co/DAQFOufJj5
مستوى الكوليستيرول واحتمالات الوفاة الناجمة عن كل الأسباب https://t.co/45b7MKnUQf https://t.co/DAQFOufJj5
RT @erik_tark: @MichaelSandstro @ifixhearts Total cholesterol, not LDL, but still matches that graph well. Sample size: 12.8 million 😲 (alt…
RT @erik_tark: @MichaelSandstro @ifixhearts Total cholesterol, not LDL, but still matches that graph well. Sample size: 12.8 million 😲 (alt…
@MichaelSandstro @ifixhearts Total cholesterol, not LDL, but still matches that graph well. Sample size: 12.8 million 😲 (although all from the same country) https://t.co/fiS4c8UmcU https://t.co/aUSaCGDuoO
@tednaiman @ScepticalDoctor @DaveKeto @ProfTimNoakes @PenelopeFigtree @DrDeborahMD @cadospharma @benjaminrholmes @JackNorrisRD @TheVeganRD @timshieff I'd be very interested to see a "lifetime maximum" TC or LDL prospective analysis and see if that U-curve
@zoeharcombe Why would want to lower cholesterol? https://t.co/FPvlfChi1p
RT @raphaels7: @FrogHarmless @TuckerGoodrich 2/ mortality risk by 14%, 13%, 8%, 7%, 6% and 3%, respectively, and decreases it 13%, 27%, 34%…
@FrogHarmless @TuckerGoodrich 2/ mortality risk by 14%, 13%, 8%, 7%, 6% and 3%, respectively, and decreases it 13%, 27%, 34%, 31%, 20% and 13%, respectively, when cholesterol is ≥ 200 mg/dL https://t.co/jm8CTc9zJw
@kevinnbass Honest question. Any opinion on this recent paper suggesting a significant higher mortality associated with a low level of total cholesterol: https://t.co/stnAkN8OqH
Low total cholesterol is deadly. Ditch veg oil. https://t.co/FPvlfChi1p
@agingdoc1 "There is general agreement that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the most important risk factor for atherosclerosis and plays a causal role in the development of ASCVD." How do we reconcile this with the following study? https://
@ScepticalDoctor You might be interested in this: Total cholesterol and all-cause mortality by sex and age: a prospective cohort study among 12.8 million adults https://t.co/FPvlfChi1p
@IdanOnTweeter @DoctorTro @Dr__Guess @BioLayne I worded it clumsily, but I'm referring to Dave's lipid triad challenge https://t.co/3Fnk6tUsm0 U-curve, not monotonic https://t.co/jm8CTc9zJw (it's about total cholesterol here, but recall that the vast majo
@tednaiman Have you seen this? https://t.co/tQqG7P1of0
@kevinnbass @DrNadolsky @AlexJLeaf @The_Nutrivore thoughts on this study? https://t.co/tQqG7P1of0
@dylanarmbruste3 @drpablocorral The writer also says you need big numbers to prove that something is harmfull. This is a study on 12.8 million koreans looking at cholesterol and ACM. Is this cohort big enough for you? They also found a U curve correlation.
Is your doctor lecturing you about #cholesterol? Low is worse than high ~ "TC levels associated with lowest mortality were 210–249 mg/dL... The inverse associations for TC < 200 mg/dL were stronger than the positive associations in the upper range." |
a study on nearly 13 MILLION people.
@MyNutritionSci @AlexJLeaf @jerryteixeira @raphaels7 @DoctorTro @IMWHorvitz Populations studies, like this one: https://t.co/2H0kuFs1HY Are you sure that people if FH have higher ACM? @LDLSkeptic has shown some studies that this was not the case. If there