@EndWokeness Lower cholesterol is more likely to cause a heart attack. https://t.co/9WZIIf66po https://t.co/c0Lv4D3o0C
RT @MehmetE_Krkmz: Kolesterol sağ kalım ilişkisi. Bir doğru sanılan yanlış daha 👇 Tüm nedenlere bağlı ölüm için en uygun kolesterol seviy…
RT @maiti_86: @muroran1978 https://t.co/n3RN8aqh0O そうですね。この論文においてはそのとおりです。 ただ私は中性脂肪が高いことはよいこととは思っていません。内訳は確かに大切です。
RT @maiti_86: @muroran1978 https://t.co/n3RN8aqh0O そうですね。この論文においてはそのとおりです。 ただ私は中性脂肪が高いことはよいこととは思っていません。内訳は確かに大切です。
RT @maiti_86: @muroran1978 https://t.co/n3RN8aqh0O そうですね。この論文においてはそのとおりです。 ただ私は中性脂肪が高いことはよいこととは思っていません。内訳は確かに大切です。
@muroran1978 https://t.co/n3RN8aqh0O そうですね。この論文においてはそのとおりです。 ただ私は中性脂肪が高いことはよいこととは思っていません。内訳は確かに大切です。
RT @MehmetE_Krkmz: Kolesterol sağ kalım ilişkisi. Bir doğru sanılan yanlış daha 👇 Tüm nedenlere bağlı ölüm için en uygun kolesterol seviy…
Hayret verici bir bulgu 200-260 arasındaki kişilerin Klosterol ilacı kullanması gereksiz.İlaç sanayii zengin ediliyor.
@korcanayata https://t.co/LA8lYlZlGy. Korcan bey bu araştırma nasıl? Büyük kolesterol yalanları
@drdaisyy https://t.co/LA8lYlYNR0. Kolesterol yalanları gibi sanki Özlem hanım
RT @MehmetE_Krkmz: Kolesterol sağ kalım ilişkisi. Bir doğru sanılan yanlış daha 👇 Tüm nedenlere bağlı ölüm için en uygun kolesterol seviy…
RT @MehmetE_Krkmz: Kolesterol sağ kalım ilişkisi. Bir doğru sanılan yanlış daha 👇 Tüm nedenlere bağlı ölüm için en uygun kolesterol seviy…
Kolesterol sağ kalım ilişkisi. Bir doğru sanılan yanlış daha 👇 Tüm nedenlere bağlı ölüm için en uygun kolesterol seviyesi : 210-249 mg/dl Kolesterolü 150'nin altında birinin riski 300'ün üzerinde olandan daha fazla > 12 milyon yetişkinin incelenmesi
@DrAseemMalhotra @CebmOxford @carlheneghan It seems like every GP Doc want to put medium level TC patients on #statins even if they have a high HDL this report shows I am in the low point of Mortality Risk yet my docs wants the #payola https://t.co/0qeVMx
@ABridgen And why even lowering cholesterol if it is good for the body? https://t.co/46Ev2zghT3 For N=1 experiments on cholesterol follow @realDaveFeldman. This man explains it in nutshell!
@Drlipid what’s your take on all these studies showing U shaped all cause mortality curve with TC, like this: https://t.co/fWEuBcROHm
@holmanm If you look at all cause mortality, low cholesterol is more dangerous than high. It's been a big fat lie to whip people up in fear over numbers and sell them brain wasting drugs. https://t.co/RuYa0etRKL
@NutritionMadeS3 @drmatthewnagra @Drlipid Saw a study ab total cholesterol & a U shaped link with mortality & best outcomes for high TC between 210-249.Although this doesn’t take LDL into account,I still find the association bizarre.Can you explain
RT @cactusapinyona: @LittleLingvo @RougeNoirUK @NaturallyFTW @natural_mag @leelasik Dropped mine from over 300 to 240 with niacin. It has t…
See, you have a lower risk of dying, and all cause is all you care about, if your cholesterol for men and women above 45 is about 180-280 mg/dL. For men, low cholesterol means much higher risk of death. Reverse J curve. https://t.co/BWVavFzsCn
@LittleLingvo @RougeNoirUK @NaturallyFTW @natural_mag @leelasik Dropped mine from over 300 to 240 with niacin. It has to be flush niacin which can freak you out so I got timed release. Look at Japanese study - people with higher cholesterol lived longer ht
@KierstenWarren What's high? I got a 5.8moll/L recently, quite shocked as I have v good BMI, etc. Lots of experts disagreeing but fitness & good diet 👏 https://t.co/BuIEszt5uL
@BookAddictGrrl High cholesterol long life. Low cholesterol early death. We've have been lied to for 60 years. https://t.co/tlqxOWKowf
RT @Kneecapsurfs: @TMurray22 @Mangan150 Went a different route and checked the old email to my doc. Here's one: https://t.co/HDxCOQz3gN
@TMurray22 @Mangan150 Went a different route and checked the old email to my doc. Here's one: https://t.co/HDxCOQz3gN
Fun fact, "regardless of sex and age. Total Cholesterol ranges associated with the lowest mortality were 210–249 mg/dL".. so a vegan diet increases risk of mortality. Good to know. https://t.co/ta4YJqzf9D
@AmatorTotalny @realtek12345 @thebartcich Bardzo polecam ten artykuł: https://t.co/bvAyM6TQc7
@PeterRansome @LDLSkeptic @Mangan150 A fair and thoughtful question. And for asking we will work to ban you from this platform :-) - kidding of course. The graph I posted was from this study, to get additional details https://t.co/MYybf0Lt8Q
@KrissBergTweets Yeah this DNA health consultant shared with me when I asked about my 230 cholesterol. https://t.co/4B75Lgj1Qn
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
RT @NikosNoulezas: "Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη…
"Άτομα με χοληστερίνη 210-249, ένα επίπεδο που οι γιατροί θεωρούν πολύ υψηλό, ήταν το βέλτιστο επίπεδο για τη χαμηλότερη θνησιμότητα από όλες τις αιτίες. Χοληστερίνη μικρότερη των 150 ήταν πιο επικίνδυνη από μία στα 300, ως προς την θνησιμότητα." https:/
@M_Vigik @KenWilliams001 @cardioRPh @ZackStrength Seems clear to me 200-260 is the sweet spot. https://t.co/KoEMdfWVCq
@popeyeuk1 @n_njal @ScepticalDoctor He probably means this. Mind, as ever, that association is not proof of causation. https://t.co/hxgM5MuzDg
Total cholesterol vs mortality —In ranges of 50–199 & 200–449 mg/dL, each 39 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) increase linked to 23% lower & 7% higher mortality —Lowest mortality 210–249 mg/dL, except for men 18–34 years (180–219); women 18–34y (160–199); 35–44y (
I'm 51. Cholesterol around 240 looks good in this study https://t.co/UVTwU3rdGU
@SalvinoBetty @Eli23541052 @socketking @KenDBerryMD I was offered a satin but didn't take it. I suppose the issue is not settled in the medical community. Looking at a big Korean study the best total cholesterol was between 200-250 for the fewest deaths. h
@Bjorkbok @AJGlassberg @waitbutwhy As well low cholesterol levels are associated with higher risk of negative health outcomes. https://t.co/XCL5TPe5NG https://t.co/RkERtSQZRe
@DerekPederson3 @taylorgrayson @ScepticalAussie Based on marker studies based on bad information. "Healthy" is fuzzy, and absolutely is dose-responsive. https://t.co/olOAzQHGTx
Niveles óptimos del colesterol entre 210 -249 en los últimos estudios independientes.
Scientific Reports- Total cholesterol and all-cause mortality by sex and age: a prospective cohort study among 12.8 million adults. Cholesterol less than 150 was riskier than one of 300. https://t.co/KfUPOyI535
@nutrition_facts @DrEsselstyn Worth a look https://t.co/rgfztYwn7w
Just a small sample size of 12.8 million humans. "Total cholesterol levels associated with lowest mortality were 210-249 mg/dL, except for men aged 18-34 years (180-219 mg/dL) and women aged 18-34 years (160-199 mg/dL) and 35-44 years (180-219 mg/dL)." htt
@DrDeborahMD I suppose you are saying this based on the Korean study. It applies to women in the age group 18-44 years. Cholesterol and statins have been controversial. Seeing the results was unbelievable. I will go by what my doctor recommends. https:/
RT @PhilosophersCab: @Mangan150 Never mind found it in the comments :D https://t.co/H7HNXvzCqG
@nealkhosla @russell_buck Here's an interesting one, no statins but paints the picture on total cholesterol and all-cause mortality (the lower the total cholesterol below 220 the higher). https://t.co/NR9X8XWrEq).
@CornivoreA @DrNadolsky https://t.co/Ftg9yQI8M5 My total cholesterol numbers couldn't be more perfect according to this all cause mortality chart. I'm at the absolute bottom of the risk ratios for both all cause mortality and cardiac related mortality
@Conor_Br @Hragy @Drlipid @SABOURETCardio @drscottyk I mean isn't this the gold standard of cholesterol studies? https://t.co/KoEMdfWVCq
@Jinzang @MikePilling1 @saaiyer Actually that seven minute video didn’t explain anything. https://t.co/HJiuu2CNcE https://t.co/lr04R3RjLh https://t.co/lKtHGlCo9H https://t.co/79S8D6dUQe
RT @GD_Fraser: @NutritionMadeS3 Seriously? This is Relative Risk Reduction, 2/5th of F'All, now compare that damage done by the statins, n…
RT @GD_Fraser: @NutritionMadeS3 Seriously? This is Relative Risk Reduction, 2/5th of F'All, now compare that damage done by the statins, n…