RT @BjornLomborg: @julianhitchcock @mattwridley This is from Nature: https://t.co/CPMMGcMjLg, so if anything Matt is underplaying the point…
RT @BjornLomborg: @julianhitchcock @mattwridley This is from Nature: https://t.co/CPMMGcMjLg, so if anything Matt is underplaying the point…
@julianhitchcock @mattwridley This is from Nature: https://t.co/CPMMGcMjLg, so if anything Matt is underplaying the point But here is another from 2020, showing "Overall, the global area of forest increases significantly (p = 0.0000) from 1982 to 2015." h
המאמר https://t.co/2pfC9rg4kV
@DekelTom @DerpDTBR וגם אסיה https://t.co/2pfC9rg4kV
THE DATA: [1] https://t.co/OlnicSnFZA [2] https://t.co/E5rGR9Cl0I [3] https://t.co/wpIredjUIm [4] https://t.co/I2iBbWBFW0 [5] https://t.co/kzqbIFsLRm [6] https://t.co/tDORXQ3NOm [7] https://t.co/8v1otoW06M [8] https://t.co/NSnyOiUjVh [9] https://t.co/Bdq38
THE DATA: [1] https://t.co/OlnicSnFZA [2] https://t.co/E5rGR9Cl0I [3] https://t.co/wpIredjUIm [4] https://t.co/I2iBbWBFW0 [5] https://t.co/kzqbIFsLRm [6] https://t.co/tDORXQ3NOm [7] https://t.co/8v1otoW06M [8] https://t.co/NSnyOiUjVh [9] https://t.co/Bdq38
@Aaron_Chirps @BjornLomborg During 1982-2016 we gained 2.24 million km2 of tree cover even with significant reduction in rain forest cover. https://t.co/JTeQCZL3Om
@CnnmnSchnpps @BjornLomborg @GretaThunberg Between 1982-2016 tree-cover increased by 2.24 million km2 (7.1 %) world-wide regardless of significant reduction of rainforest area. https://t.co/JTeQCZL3Om
@aberron Los problemas de la Amazonia no son sólo consecuencia del ganado. En cualquier caso, el mundo se está reforestando en su conjunto: https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60
@Midietacojea 2 datos: - El planeta se está reforestando. Publicado en Nature: https://t.co/Bn6IS1QqtA - Toda la soja q no nos comemos directamente (85%) se prensa para obtener aceite. Lo q sobra va al ganado. Podría comersexo no hay demanda. El ganado rec
"Contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km^2 (+7.1% relative to the 1982 level)." https://t.co/kGbiP8Mjtq https://t.co/ayZ5EGWvq8
@philip_ciwf @ciwf @wwf_uk @guardian @Act4AnimalsEU Well, actually forests are growing and more than offsetting their decline, Nature's paper: https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60
@perraphilosofic @ierrejon Link al artículo de Nature al que se refiere la mayor parte del post reseñado en mi tuit anterior https://t.co/GZfLVam0zF
RT @JuanPascual4: @__JetSetWilly__ @paulap_cc @joseluislrivas @mikeliturriaga Cierto, le paso el estudio que debería haberle compartido y q…
@__JetSetWilly__ @paulap_cc @joseluislrivas @mikeliturriaga Cierto, le paso el estudio que debería haberle compartido y q corrobora el aumento de superficie arbolada en el planeta: https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
RT @mattwridley: "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 mill…
"We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2 (+7.1% relative to the 1982 level)." https://t.co/esIuObq7IC
RT @Gods_Spy: There are more trees now than there were 35 years ago https://t.co/UDrOdqnjM9 https://t.co/pHn7mJ9kVZ
@Siconik1 @mattyglesias @binarybits Do you mean reforestation? 1982-2016 + 7.1% to the forest mass in the world https://t.co/P0opgNfu17
RT @EdRojasBr: Los datos d FAO son anuales; la definición d bosques de FAO es más restrictiva y las metodologías no son comparables; en tod…
RT @Reconoc22291280: @EdRojasBr 8,8 millones de ha de pérdida superficie forestal es el dato que da FAO para la década de los 90, no por añ…
Los datos d FAO son anuales; la definición d bosques de FAO es más restrictiva y las metodologías no son comparables; en todo caso FAO reconoce balance 0 d stocks d carbono en 2020
@EdRojasBr 8,8 millones de ha de pérdida superficie forestal es el dato que da FAO para la década de los 90, no por año. En la década 2000-2010 lo rebaja a 5,2 millones ha. Song et al. (2018), hablan de ganancia de superficie forestal de 2,24 mill. km2 e
RT @Reconoc22291280: @paristotelis_ @jmmulet El indiscutible aumento de la masa forestal en el planeta las últimas décadas es indicativo d…
@paristotelis_ @jmmulet El indiscutible aumento de la masa forestal en el planeta las últimas décadas es indicativo de que ahora hay más extensión y más densidad forestal que antes (Barrio Sésamo) https://t.co/OMX4sWdMOF
RT @MaxCRoser: This Nature paper from last year showed that “contrary to the prevailing view" global global forest area increased by 7.1% s…
@DominicRessel @Freavonwegen @nulleberg Ja, erinnere mich auch. Interessanterweise ist es nicht nur übertrieben, sondern sogar vom Vorzeichen falsch weil oft neue Wälder ignoriert werden. https://t.co/uhmBlHrG1Q
@hommel_b @MarionKoopmans Ik begrijp niet goed waarom ze over ontbossing begint. Er mogen alleen maar bomen bij: https://t.co/MpGpUYThor
@WirHabenEsSatt2 Mal abgesehen davon, dass der Artikel Müll ist... Entwaldung in den Tropen ist so überflüssig wie vermeidbar. Hat allerdings mit unserem Futter alles nur wenig zu tun. Und das hier wisst ihr sicher: https://t.co/ueLA1cGpzB
@Fabriziofer1994 @FilBarbera "We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2 (+7.1% relative to the 1982 level)." https://t.co/JtH4LTvzSF
@22xTJuan @FullMetalSofi Viven de clichés, que encima son tan viejos que yo los escuchaba de niño viendo el Capitán Planeta. Lo de la deforestación ha sido refutado 60 mil veces https://t.co/GIrYaVeDrl https://t.co/OFIqA75laK
@inno_qt @PNS_News @tlhickman1 Yes, some areas experience deforestation, larger strips of land gained forest, outpacing the deforestation by over 1m kilometers. https://t.co/7M3Ln1KyuS
@inno_qt @PNS_News @tlhickman1 But you didn't, while I did. My source was published August 2018, and covers a 35 year long period of time, and also contradicts previously asserted studies that covered smaller periods of time. https://t.co/7M3Ln1KyuS
@inno_qt @PNS_News @tlhickman1 That's not accurate at all. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 You are smoking crack if you believe that. https://t.co/7M3Ln1KyuS
@inno_qt @PNS_News @tlhickman1 BTWs mine is newer, and covers a longer period of time. https://t.co/7M3Ln1KyuS
@inno_qt @PNS_News @tlhickman1 Yes we have. https://t.co/7M3Ln1KyuS
@inno_qt @PNS_News @tlhickman1 We have gained more forests then we have lost over the last 35 years. https://t.co/7M3Ln1KyuS
@inno_qt @PNS_News And I have already discussed how clean burning carbon fuels have aided the ozone layer, and how new natural habitats have sprouted to take the place of those that have been lost as the cycle of Earth continues. https://t.co/7M3Ln1KyuS
@inno_qt @PNS_News No loss of trees, more of the world is covered by trees now, then 35 years ago. We have increased tree coverage, that is a debunked narrative that we are losing trees. https://t.co/7M3Ln1KyuS
@NicholasDCarter You have it wrong at least on 2 fronts: 1. Livestock emmissions (IPCC data) amount to 14.5% of total. This info includes direct and indirect emmissions, pg 15 https://t.co/QeykDQBZZW 2. The world is gaining forest mass (NASA data) https://
@NaturwaldAk @NitzkeSolvejg In Summe gibt es glücklicherweise jedes Jahr mehr Wald 😊 https://t.co/xwfECsB5UU (trotzdem ist die Vernichtung bestehender Wälder furchtbar) https://t.co/5mFQAPsw3I
@ElenaEG4A @ONUGeneve Actually, the planet is getting more forest cover and not less. Data: Nature and NASA: 👇 "contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2" https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60
@ONUGeneve Actually, the planet is getting more forest cover and not less. Data: Nature and NASA: 👇 "contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2" https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: @Amuni23395506 Pues no: "contrariamente a la visión predominante de q la superficie forestal mundial se ha contraído, [e…
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: @Amuni23395506 Pues no: "contrariamente a la visión predominante de q la superficie forestal mundial se ha contraído, [e…
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: @Amuni23395506 Pues no: "contrariamente a la visión predominante de q la superficie forestal mundial se ha contraído, [e…
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: @Amuni23395506 Pues no: "contrariamente a la visión predominante de q la superficie forestal mundial se ha contraído, [e…
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: @Amuni23395506 Pues no: "contrariamente a la visión predominante de q la superficie forestal mundial se ha contraído, [e…
RT @Luis_I_Gomez: @Amuni23395506 Pues no: "contrariamente a la visión predominante de q la superficie forestal mundial se ha contraído, [e…
@Amuni23395506 Pues no: "contrariamente a la visión predominante de q la superficie forestal mundial se ha contraído, [en realidad] se ha incrementado en 2,24 millones de km2, esto es un aumento de 7,1% respecto al valor [global] de 1982" https://t.co/3xO
@ThibaultLebret4 @TradeLoic C'est ce qu'affirment les données du GFN lui-même. Et effectivement, des études peer-rewied expliquent que, par exemple, la superficie mondiale boisée augmente. 👇 https://t.co/JXPxy0MEbn
FRA2020 FAO UN official statistics including SDG 15.1&2 indicators, Song et al 2018: https://t.co/5Aok1ogwVh, Eurostat, ...
RT @EdRojasBr: A renamed publication should b prudent taking too early conclusions from single paper contradicting with very robust sources…
RT @EdRojasBr: A renamed publication should b prudent taking too early conclusions from single paper contradicting with very robust sources…
A renamed publication should b prudent taking too early conclusions from single paper contradicting with very robust sources eg recent FRA2020 by #UNFAO, empírical evidence and other very solid global publications (https://t.co/5Aok1ogwVh) coinciding with
@cronicasdefauna @AlbertoSosaN En la época donde más ganadería hay, el mundo no se está deforestando sino reforestando (Brasil es una excepción) https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60
@graphific Ook zij vinden dat er zijn tussen tss 1982-2016 bomen bijgekomen (2.2 miljoen km² en er 'naakte grond' is verdwenen. Er is tropisch bos verdwenen en niet-tropisch 'bos' bijgekomen (TC=tree cover, SV=short vegetation, BG=bare ground). https://t.
@platafloporsin @InmaLozano10 Hablábamos de epidemias. Claro que la ganadería tiene sus áreas de mejora, como muchas otras actividades. Aunque, le agradecería estudios, no artículos. Le paso un dato, de hecho el mundo se está reforestando. Un saludo htt
@climate It is, but global forests increased by 7%. https://t.co/QmkMp3wefa
@dortizgonzalo @JulioBasulto_DN De hecho el planeta se está reforestando: https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60 El desperdicio vegetal tb se mide en hogares, no en los campos donde se tiran millones de TMs de frutas y verduras pq no cumplen los parámetros q piden las ca
@peterjtromp @DominikBarbato @GretaThunberg "We killed the trees, the thing that's supposed to suck up the CO2, remember?" Tree cover has 𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒅 by 2.24 million km² (+7.1% relative to the 1982 level) but thanks for your silly tweet. https://t.co/qtDql
@greekmcchic @MichaelKGoff @OskaArcher The references should have been in there. https://t.co/8WylnK2jTe
RT @nobodywz: @tomselliott @seanmdav @BillWeirCNN Actually forest are growing https://t.co/ndQE56Y3MS. CNN, fake news.
@shesholastra @ogrecio En realidad el mundo se está reforestando. Así lo demuestran imágenes satélite en este estudio de Nature: https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60 Aunque hay regiones q pierden masa forestal, el mundo en su conjunto, la está aumentando
@nedelec_alain @2r2d75 @laydgeur Au niveau mondial, la superficie boisée augmente : https://t.co/JXPxy0MEbn
@AgusBC3 @DanielRoanes @ecienciacom @A_Aretxabala @BC3Research @FAOAnimalHealth La tasa de reforestación global es positiva: https://t.co/TkJiGTMc60 Ahora bien en el Amazonas, aunque la deforestación disminuye, sigue. Pero desde el 2007, la sup de pastos h
RT @Antarcticacl: A pesar de reducción de bosques tropicales, cobertura global de Árboles aumentó 7% entre 1982-2016. Cobertura de suelo “d…
RT @KabiriStella: Contrary to popular belief that forest area has declined, tree cover has increased by over 2 million sqkm globally. As th…
RT @KabiriStella: Contrary to popular belief that forest area has declined, tree cover has increased by over 2 million sqkm globally. As th…
Contrary to popular belief that forest area has declined, tree cover has increased by over 2 million sqkm globally. As the tropics lost, the extra-tropics gained, mainly Asia. Keep planting them trees, we are seeing a difference. https://t.co/V921obWeUj h