RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
@MAasvestad @BjornLomborg Do you mean this? https://t.co/jKzLLJUVSW
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
@BjornLomborg trying to pull the wool as usual. Explanation begins here 👇 at "One of the most interesting...": https://t.co/qkscW9x1lP.
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
RT @BjornLomborg: Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased"…
Many suggest this is because fewer forests. No More forests and vegetated area: "We show that tree cover has increased" Nature, 2018, https://t.co/ZLmmQbnpce "Overall, the global area of forest increases significantly from 1982 to 2015." 2020, https://t.
"During the period 1982–2016 [...] contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally, tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2 (+7.1% relative to the 1982 level)" https://t.co/jPOCLhaDBL
RT @lind_ake: Jordens skogsareal ökar ,mellan 1982 och 2016 var ökningen drygt 7 %.#klimat https://t.co/j2RCgUph4l
@pmditonh Nature did a study in 2018 and found that global tree cover increased over 7%, and forest area losses in the tropics were outweighed by gains elsewhere. https://t.co/XimUliJa4x
@dariomarkas @Malo_san_Maka Ne, to nije istina; npr.; We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally5—tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2 (+7.1% relative to the 1982 level). https://t.co/tey2byOMZe
Étude intéressante ⬇️⚡ https://t.co/WTfMafsTfu
@HULETTSC @washingtonpost Apologies forgot link, https://t.co/BXVld3d6KQ There is merit to your photo btw, but a localized temp change doesn’t equal climate scale changes and that problem is easily fixed, with slightly different building practices we used
RT @lind_ake: Jordens skogsareal ökar ,mellan 1982 och 2016 var ökningen drygt 7 %.#klimat https://t.co/j2RCgUph4l
RT @lind_ake: Jordens skogsareal ökar ,mellan 1982 och 2016 var ökningen drygt 7 %.#klimat https://t.co/j2RCgUph4l
@Race2Extinct Forest cover has increased since 1982 not decreased! https://t.co/jbEN2XMvjR https://t.co/IcXx8y8vs5
@MisinformNoMore @Xibalbus @LeonSimons8 @elonmusk @MuskUniversity "contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally5—tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2" That is a whopping 7%! https://t.co/C8RSDytTlP
@Markle2k @alex_house @AukeHoekstra @EloMusk In the tropics, yes, but generally tree cover has increased though: https://t.co/iVKVrZSQ7v
@Romeo_257 @AmaurySaucedo https://t.co/j0Hly30NaV ¿Cuál mentira?
@darius_nau Dubiose Grafik der World Bank, keine Wissenschaft. "Nature"-Studie über den gleichen Zeitraum: "We show that - contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally - tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2 (+7.1% relative
@realChasDarwin @weathernetwork @MikeHudema Your graph doesn't show percentage and only goes back to 2016. Forests expanded 7.1% from 1982 to 2016. https://t.co/nKCSanoEcR
@NickCowern @martin_fff @1followernodad 5. -and in turn our supposed “huge” impact on the climate- unquestionably. https://t.co/BXVld3d6KQ
@LammertvanRaan @fenokkio @marjanminnesma @comschonelucht @EUClimateAction @GreenpeaceEU @eddy_terstall @rubenvdmeer @ZefHemel @EcocideLaw @JKBonline @WhatsNYourPapr Voor zover ik kan vaststellen is dit de oorspronkelijke publicatie: https://t.co/0VfLJ8eR
RT @lind_ake: Jordens skogsareal ökar ,mellan 1982 och 2016 var ökningen drygt 7 %.#klimat https://t.co/j2RCgUph4l
RT @lind_ake: Jordens skogsareal ökar ,mellan 1982 och 2016 var ökningen drygt 7 %.#klimat https://t.co/j2RCgUph4l
Jordens skogsareal ökar ,mellan 1982 och 2016 var ökningen drygt 7 %.#klimat https://t.co/j2RCgUph4l
@XiscoMolina @amturiel Yo no he opinado, solo compartí datos científicos que contradicen lo que aquí se apoya https://t.co/biwoxVbII1 Pero no recibo argumentos en contra, tampoco en otros hilos de Antonio, solo escurrir el bulto y ahora bloqueo 1/2 https:/
@amturiel La masa forestal no ha parado de aumentar en las últimas decadas en España y en el mundo. Su activismo político siempre está por encima de su integridad como científico, hágaselo mirar, no todo el mundo es idiota o interesado x aquí https://t.co
@johndoe020202 @audrey_russo @jordanbpeterson Well except that we are GAINING greenspace since 1982. Except for that little inconvenient fact. https://t.co/acAGswv5eU
@doge369420 @IonutAlbu14 @jordanbpeterson Nope, we are gaining green tree coverage. https://t.co/acAGswv5eU
@ed_hawkins Total tree covered land in the world is increasing. There is no net deforestation. Reference: https://t.co/XAFLZbpR7Q
RT @mattwridley: Although net deforestation still happens in some countries, globally it has reversed. ‘We show that — contrary to the pr…
RT @mattwridley: Although net deforestation still happens in some countries, globally it has reversed. ‘We show that — contrary to the pr…
RT @mattwridley: Although net deforestation still happens in some countries, globally it has reversed. ‘We show that — contrary to the pr…
RT @mattwridley: Although net deforestation still happens in some countries, globally it has reversed. ‘We show that — contrary to the pr…
RT @mattwridley: Although net deforestation still happens in some countries, globally it has reversed. ‘We show that — contrary to the pr…
RT @mattwridley: Although net deforestation still happens in some countries, globally it has reversed. ‘We show that — contrary to the pr…
Although net deforestation still happens in some countries, globally it has reversed. ‘We show that — contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally — tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2.’ https://t.co/njn8iKbJVC
@151Call @HumanistReport A team of researchers from the U of Maryland, the University of New York and NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center has found that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally—tree cover has actually increased
@blancastopp Según el https://t.co/6RD0xkqPMw el cataclismo climático siempre será mañana, pero yo le enlazo aquí un estudio de una de las principales revistas científicas sobre la evolución del terreno a nivel global las últimas décadas: aumento de la mas
RT @BjornLomborg: Several comments incorrectly claim that more deforestation but more agriculture masks this 1) agriculture would have les…
@MoiraR No. Globally tree cover to 2018 *increased* by 2.24M km2 (+7.1% relative to 1982). Net loss in the tropics outweighed by a net gain elsewhere. +Of all land changes, 60% associated w direct human activities, 40% w indirect drivers such as climate ch
@LaBombetta76 @KersevanRoberto @I_Faiella @RobertoIngross2 @NASA Lo studio pubblicato su #Nature: https://t.co/k0xv0zdkCo
RT @BjornLomborg: Several comments incorrectly claim that more deforestation but more agriculture masks this 1) agriculture would have les…