| Title |
Monitoring T cell–dendritic cell interactions in vivo by intercellular enzymatic labelling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature25442 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giulia Pasqual, Aleksey Chudnovskiy, Jeroen M. J. Tas, Marianna Agudelo, Lawrence D. Schweitzer, Ang Cui, Nir Hacohen, Gabriel D. Victora |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 490 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 126 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 51 | 10% |
| France | 17 | 3% |
| Spain | 17 | 3% |
| Canada | 14 | 3% |
| Germany | 12 | 2% |
| India | 12 | 2% |
| Australia | 12 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 68 | 14% |
| Unknown | 155 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 284 | 58% |
| Scientists | 184 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 724 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 179 | 25% |
| Researcher | 132 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 6% |
| Other | 105 | 15% |
| Unknown | 148 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 168 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 157 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 24 | 3% |
| Other | 74 | 10% |
| Unknown | 161 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 358. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#91,490
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,423
of 98,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,217
of 454,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#124
of 842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.