RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @PatrickForterre: Removing one protein from a concatenation can dramatically change a tree topology https://t.co/ICZemCiKhj
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/1aWL5uxQiq
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
Removing one protein from a concatenation can dramatically change a tree topology https://t.co/ICZemCiKhj
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @BahaNick: Loving this science **drama**. Latest study says Ctenophores first https://t.co/67dVxxuSXq !contra https://t.co/oLX4obsK7S
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
rising again... https://t.co/tLODMBiY2Q
RT @OurBluePlanet: New paper suggests sponges aren't the oldest ancestor of animal life! https://t.co/Rfwfktb5Dj #mondaymotivation Comb je…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
And back we go again. Another one for ctenophores first! https://t.co/m538unQK2I
And... more hats in the ring on sponges vs ctenophores first. This one says ctenophores first. #physticuffs https://t.co/TZnnmRSP13
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @plaza_genomics: . @fleliaer species tree inference using concatenated alignments https://t.co/JR9hvVNk8k
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @polarfire: I almost missed this. I guess it's good I use twitter. More evidence for the ctenophore-sister hypothesis https://t.co/vP2z…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
Nice paper on cause of phylogenetic disagreement. Fun fact: @RokasLab occupies my former @VanderbiltU office/lab space. #evolution https://t.co/KBJaAMEAU3
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @OurBluePlanet: New paper suggests sponges aren't the oldest ancestor of animal life! https://t.co/Rfwfktb5Dj #mondaymotivation Comb je…
RT @tera_levin: Interesting "phylogenetic signal across eight data matrices consistently supports ctenophores as the sister group to all ot…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
I almost missed this. I guess it's good I use twitter. More evidence for the ctenophore-sister hypothesis https://t.co/vP2zU4ODMs
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
「最初期に分岐した動物群は何なのか?」という議論は続く.クシクラゲでは,という最近の研究. https://t.co/UlW6QQ8b2V
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @BahaNick: Loving this science **drama**. Latest study says Ctenophores first https://t.co/67dVxxuSXq !contra https://t.co/oLX4obsK7S
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @tera_levin: Interesting "phylogenetic signal across eight data matrices consistently supports ctenophores as the sister group to all ot…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
This probably will lead to change in the phylo tree of tree of life https://t.co/xuvsOaadEJ
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @jwfchu: Who's on First? Today, it's Ctenophores again. https://t.co/NOoMOyp92y https://t.co/kXyD1NhcVZ
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
After hit by #ctenosis jabs,nice punch from #porisis lately, but #porisis now hit by uppercut. Glass chin or can #porisis come back again? https://t.co/37qMZgGLgz
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
Loving this science **drama**. Latest study says Ctenophores first https://t.co/67dVxxuSXq !contra https://t.co/oLX4obsK7S
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…