RT @RobLanfear: @luke_campillo @jembrown @rcthomson I love this paper. 2 out of 248 genes fundamentally change the answer! I think that and…
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/6oHwWTXA8L
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes | Nature Ecology & Evolution สหสัมพันธ์ทางวิวัฒนาการซึ่งเป็นข้อโต้เถียงกันสามารถขับเคลื่อนไปด้วยการศึกษายีน https://t.co/ZXAuzANXzB
RT @LoreAment: And second, we showed that most molecular markers typically used for fungal phylogenetics have weak signal for a key node in…
And second, we showed that most molecular markers typically used for fungal phylogenetics have weak signal for a key node in the tree, based on gene-wise log-likelihood scores as developed by Shen et al (2017; https://t.co/n2NbKrhzfs). We should be more cr
@macroevolut @Jesus_LozanoF I agree, that’s an interesting one. Since recommendations are given, everybody should read this article too https://t.co/FqL0A9vLfK
@ctenopapers ?That is a 2017 paper that turned out not to be the last word, even for 2017: https://t.co/kcewanZixl
@KollmarMartin @shenxingxing1 @AlbertVilella This article looked at the alternative topologies. But the support seems to be almost 50:50. Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/8fx5lR2kbf https:/
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017hig…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017hig…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017hig…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017hig…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017hig…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017hig…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017hig…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017hig…
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/C5aUm13xq4 #May2017highlight #ICYMI https://t.co/VVPu7rz4yX
RT @NatureJapan: NatureEcology & Evolution創刊1周年記念 Collection「ゲノム系統学研究で論争の的になっている系統関係は、ごく少数の遺伝子によって推論されている場合がある」https://t.co/dHqOGDo1oQ #Na…
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/u3wcL7lqNs
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/NLzaWU6hqg
RT @NatureJapan: NatureEcology & Evolution創刊1周年記念 Collection「ゲノム系統学研究で論争の的になっている系統関係は、ごく少数の遺伝子によって推論されている場合がある」https://t.co/dHqOGDo1oQ #Na…
NatureEcology & Evolution創刊1周年記念 Collection「ゲノム系統学研究で論争の的になっている系統関係は、ごく少数の遺伝子によって推論されている場合がある」https://t.co/dHqOGDo1oQ #NatEcolEvol https://t.co/jdapZSu3n8
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @CorrieMoreau: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/MpNXaWb9…
Publication Alert: "Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes" https://t.co/z7NxpwNCs2
RT @JSperschneider: Interesting and scary stuff... Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes ht…
Interesting and scary stuff... Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/GwammUoCel
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/i5OkKHY5Lc
RT @CorrieMoreau: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/MpNXaWb9…
RT @CorrieMoreau: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/MpNXaWb9…
RT @CorrieMoreau: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/MpNXaWb9…
RT @CorrieMoreau: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/MpNXaWb9…
RT @CorrieMoreau: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/MpNXaWb9…
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/MpNXaWb9Hh
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/YkymPwfBTT
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
Phylogenomics JC: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes by @RokasLab https://t.co/quZBMVEOSP
RT @ElinVidevall: Great journal club discussion today about this very interesting phylogenomic paper from @RokasLab https://t.co/y9XQk3UpnT
RT @ElinVidevall: Great journal club discussion today about this very interesting phylogenomic paper from @RokasLab https://t.co/y9XQk3UpnT
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/wsAZIwUXfn
RT @ElinVidevall: Great journal club discussion today about this very interesting phylogenomic paper from @RokasLab https://t.co/y9XQk3UpnT
RT @TwelveSharp: #icanhazpdf https://t.co/CrGPqzj5RW yvescle [at] gmail Thanks!!
#icanhazpdf https://t.co/CrGPqzj5RW yvescle [at] gmail Thanks!!
Great journal club discussion today about this very interesting phylogenomic paper from @RokasLab https://t.co/y9XQk3UpnT
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes #365papers https://t.co/k9htczyx4L
Hey dear! 🐥 I like traveling and sех. Soon I will be in ur city Send me msg 👏 https://t.co/0wgSmvb7Yy https://t.co/utn1yMocYG
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @RobLanfear: If you do/use phylogenetics, please stop, take 20 minutes, and read this paper. It's important. https://t.co/K7J3DwSMB3 4…
Why some key branches of the tree of life remain unresolved even when genome-scale amounts of data are used https://t.co/r6G2FKsJfM
RT @sinnafoch: wow, interesting and scary: https://t.co/PZSrJUyNLu
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
@NewBaro per vendicarmi dei periteci di oggi ❤️ https://t.co/yS00Frl1T0
RT @sinnafoch: wow, interesting and scary: https://t.co/PZSrJUyNLu
wow, interesting and scary: https://t.co/PZSrJUyNLu
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
Impressive - and scary - if true https://t.co/OA62Sqefj1
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/QP4fY6NVX6
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @3rdreviewer: I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
Más no siempre es mejor: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/AZOgglgZLb
I finally read this paper from the @RokasLab fully: it is amazing (and scary). https://t.co/UIN6fIKcCf
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
例えばワニはカメと鳥と、どちらの方が先祖だと思いますか。実は同じ手法だと鳥が先祖だということになるのです。今後生命の木がどのように書き換わるのか楽しみですね。https://t.co/ILeY2be6VX #翔和学園 #ギフテッド #gifted #academic →
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @BahaNick: Loving this science **drama**. Latest study says Ctenophores first https://t.co/67dVxxuSXq !contra https://t.co/oLX4obsK7S
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/xiWjpv31Wu
RT @BahaNick: Loving this science **drama**. Latest study says Ctenophores first https://t.co/67dVxxuSXq !contra https://t.co/oLX4obsK7S
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @fjlapointe: the #TreeOfLife is not a tree. Difficult times for phylogeneticists https://t.co/WMm16MG4yj
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
the #TreeOfLife is not a tree. Difficult times for phylogeneticists https://t.co/WMm16MG4yj
#icanhazpdf Nature Ecology and Evolution https://t.co/VBM5qzjA4Q michelle.wille "at" https://t.co/wKGwmv0pfR pls/thx
#260papers Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/RJKfeshvJ9
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EX5esrNxFJ
Research describing how small subsets of phylogenomic data matrices can affects resolution of particular internodes: https://t.co/zqjUzyzXwD
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…