RT @polarfire: I've already used the method in this paper on some datasets, and it's rather illustrative. https://t.co/v9ykaAckvt
I've already used the method in this paper on some datasets, and it's rather illustrative. https://t.co/v9ykaAckvt
"...the distribution of phylogenetic signal is essential for evaluating whether branches...are truly resolved" https://t.co/VTHojwLSGX
Quantifying phylogenetic signal to reveal genes that indicate contentious relationships https://t.co/HMY6Wr8pWX
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RobLanfear: If you do/use phylogenetics, please stop, take 20 minutes, and read this paper. It's important. https://t.co/K7J3DwSMB3 4…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes : Nature Ecology & Evolution https://t.co/61xj6FCpUi
Comb jellies (#ctenophores), not seemingly simple #sponges, may be the oldest multicellular animals. #evolution https://t.co/VydsWvdlYq https://t.co/DKYDLHDqPR
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @plaza_genomics: . @fleliaer species tree inference using concatenated alignments https://t.co/JR9hvVNk8k
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @BadInvertJokes: How did the two sisters save money on clothes? They shared most of their jeans. https://t.co/Rxx7hWDTAD
How did the two sisters save money on clothes? They shared most of their jeans. https://t.co/Rxx7hWDTAD
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @PatrickForterre: Removing one protein from a concatenation can dramatically change a tree topology https://t.co/ICZemCiKhj
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @MBARI_News: Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/EzHbjgOG2N #ctenophores…
RT @polarfire: I almost missed this. I guess it's good I use twitter. More evidence for the ctenophore-sister hypothesis https://t.co/vP2z…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @DanGraur: Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @PatrickForterre: Removing one protein from a concatenation can dramatically change a tree topology https://t.co/ICZemCiKhj
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
Contentious phylogenies. https://t.co/87C1uOZDiZ https://t.co/qUG8BlWuMa
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
One for the tree thinkers and tree huggers (phylogenetic types) https://t.co/t9BLJBLFCf
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
Just tweeting this so I can read later https://t.co/aXZQi8bRgR
https://t.co/ftBC7p7K9b Ctenophores as the sister group to all other metazoans... a odisseia continua!
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @Icim4Org: Ctenophora is the sister group to all other metazoans https://t.co/5mogfD13UR WHAT do #icim4Moscow SPEAKERS THINK ?
Ctenophora is the sister group to all other metazoans https://t.co/5mogfD13UR WHAT do #icim4Moscow SPEAKERS THINK ?
RT @Tanaidologist: 「最初期に分岐した動物群は何なのか?」という議論は続く.クシクラゲでは,という最近の研究. https://t.co/UlW6QQ8b2V
RT @Tanaidologist: 「最初期に分岐した動物群は何なのか?」という議論は続く.クシクラゲでは,という最近の研究. https://t.co/UlW6QQ8b2V
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @PatrickForterre: Removing one protein from a concatenation can dramatically change a tree topology https://t.co/ICZemCiKhj
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes https://t.co/yd4tnJl3EW
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
@jomcinerney Could be a good dataset to benchmark Machete. https://t.co/MQwAqiGG6D
RT @RokasLab: Our new paper on why some evolutionary relationships are so controversial is out: https://t.co/o0oZY8rAYQ see also: https://t…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Contentious phylogenomic relationships can be driven by a handful of genes. 17 contentious branches examined. https://t.c…
RT @KLIAustria: The “mother of all phylogenetic controversies” remains controversial. https://t.co/Yz1AdgCVXv
The “mother of all phylogenetic controversies” remains controversial. https://t.co/Yz1AdgCVXv
RT @ggiribet: https://t.co/Gxlndmjvzq and only a couple of weeks later, ctenophores go back to being sister group to all other animals
RT @multicellgenome: sponges, then ctenophores; sponges again, then ctenophores again; and so so... https://t.co/S7FbQcnxoT