Usando uno dei paper che stima gli impatti maggiori del settore alimentare (riferiti al 2010): ossia 17,318 ± 1,675 TgCO2eq annui ossia ~37% delle emissioni totali di GHG - https://t.co/7eWRTjbRCi si arriva ad un valore di circa il 2.6% (considerando anch
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
@the_real_player @Veganella_ @michal_ptacnik Have you ever heard of a potent greenhouse gas that warms the atmosphere faster than any other called methane? What about deforestation—destroying carbon sinks known as the Amazon rainforest to grow food for ani
@YamatLucas @PabloPastos GLEAM @FAOLivestock has been one of the pioneering efforts to asses global GHG emissions from 🐄🐐🐑. Its difficult to judge if GLEAM over/underestimates GHG emissions. We can only compare their results against other studies (e.g.
2023 Highlight: What industry causes an overwhelming amount of greenhouse gas emissions? Meat eaters produce 75% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, according to a study published in @NatureFoodJnl in 2023. Read the full study here: https://t.co/8ReB
2023 Highlight: What industry causes an overwhelming amount of greenhouse gas emissions? Meat eaters produce 75% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, according to a study published in @NatureFoodJnl in 2023. Read the full study here: https://t.co/5KCw
@AlixG_2 Oops, links from articles are hard to navigate when you’re used to using bad memes But here you go https://t.co/5a0k0LXf4F
@Kenneth72712993 @SpeddingCharlie Why is this hard to believe? Adding any carbon emitter to the system will increase C02 levels. Cattle globally is a large GHG contributor (around 14% of anthropogenic climate emissions). PS I love a good steak 😬 https://t.
@GrahamLKeegan @613spades @loochc1 Oh, I'm sorry, Graham. I forgot that you couldn't read the article to find the link to the scientific study yourself. Here you go: https://t.co/FSD4MSFBYK
@johann_bjorn Here are some papers and articles you might wish to consider reading (if you have not seen them already): https://t.co/YTBEi9Dnz0 https://t.co/ZucUDCa8oj https://t.co/ZTj3BGr88k
@PicturesFoIder Let's talk science. https://t.co/pyWRiAodLb "The global production of food is responsible for a third of all planet-heating gases emitted by human activity, with the use of animals for meat causing twice the pollution of producing plant
Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods | Nature Food https://t.co/5JasO55SQI
The conclusions they found, according to the articles they reviewed were that plant-based foods generally have twice as low greenhouse emissions than animal-based foods (Xu et al., 2021). Xu article: https://t.co/d8UaRDkTsy
@OscarGenomics @feresbar7 Tu comentario es bastante missleading, puesto que el paper habla de las diferencias en emisiones entre rumiantes (vacas) y animales monogastricos (cerdos y demás). Reducir el consumo de carne SÍ reduce las emisiones, sea cual sea:
🐄 Livestock farming is a dynamo of greenhouse-gas emissions, contributing roughly 18% of the global total. This is not to mention deforestation, pollution and biodiversity loss, all of which also warp the climate 2/13 https://t.co/EN7jLAP2yR
Data in that article taken from this 2021 paper: Xu, X., et al. (2021). Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nature Food, 2(9), 724-732. https://t.co/q1jGLuhc5Z
@pinkthetoad @HoratioG3 @AtheistDamned @Ashrose892 @MeggGawat Your claim is false. That’s why it’s important to understand the subject. Impact is calculated by water, land & GHG. https://t.co/uUJIe2fSVf https://t.co/BLK3X5aGXa https://t.co/GzGKp7ijlh
@Mart_Inangel @prtsnf Du coup, j'ai regardé un peu plus, ouvrant un article à peu près au hasard. Ils comptent à peu près 1/5 pour les changements d'usage du sol, 1/3 pour "farming" (machines, engrais, déstockage co2 net des terres cultivées), 1/3 pour le
@ssteingraber1 You seem to forget that "peer-reviewed science" is just as corruptible as any other human institution. Much of what is published (and where) depends on the authors' position in an unstated hierarchy. Anyway, let us begin with a peer-reviewed
@Hedenberg @tveitdal Conspiracy videos from Youtube or TikTok are your "reference to science"? There is quite a lot of information on Youtube and elsewhere that specifically debunk the claims from your links. Just to give you an idea of how trustworthy res
@atvingeniero ..que carece de casi todas las tablas y metodología suplementaria, que está aquí https://t.co/3wmbUErVan
@pinkthetoad @jamfranbo 7% 🤣 what did you study or send me your credentials! Stop misinforming. How do you think they preserve meat? Transport it? Where it’s produced? Up to 33% of all GHG can be attributed to agriculture and 60% to animal agriculture🤦♂️
@afrodyliac @GlobalEcoGuy Refute? Am I your kindergarten teacher? Just do some research man, read papers instead of Facebook posts. Just to get you started: https://t.co/AuMP0tlDGw
@Vivekanand89089 @a20nitin @iamharmeetK @Jairam_Ramesh https://t.co/vz58xT4c27 Maybe, this article in 'Nature' will throw some light. 57% of total global GHG emission comes from the production of animal-based food (including livestock feed),
RT @ganitlabs: @rsidd120 ~15% of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are due to livestock farming & greenhouse gas emis from animal f…
RT @ganitlabs: @rsidd120 ~15% of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are due to livestock farming & greenhouse gas emis from animal f…
Sanghi clearly knows what he is doing
@rsidd120 ~15% of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are due to livestock farming & greenhouse gas emis from animal foods are 2x those of plant-based foods. yes, there is a corr but his statement abt good human being is screwed up. https://t.co
@_RobbieMoore Fixed it for you. No Climate Action No Biome No Food No Future Meat accounts for nearly 60% of all greenhouse gases from food production. It's time to change the future and pay farmers well to convert systems and to become primary custodian
wow! climate impact of beef and comparatively https://t.co/FghTy5cbNo? (2021) "It takes 33 plant calories to produce one calorie of beef." "beef is uniquely carbon-intensive." (https://t.co/I5cT7dJGGJ https://t.co/Ou5KEsrKSY) https://t.co/FghTy5cbNo?
@1234Fit Wo ist denn ihre aktuelle 'Forschung' veröffentlicht? Das ist Forschung: (wenn das der Unwahrheit sein sollte, bitte korrigieren und veröffentlichen, sie könnten ein Star werden, Princeton und MIT werden sich überbieten sie an ihre Uni zu bekomme
@JuanPascual4 @SanyagoMoral Sobre el secuestro de C se añade aun mayores complicaciones e incertidumbres. Hay estudios donde más allá de estimar una ganancia de C debida a la ganadería estimaron lo contrario: https://t.co/OAjKGOnJss De nuevo: la clave, en
@PeyraudJean @MonsieurIrma et voilà la source pour l'échelle mondiale et les 20% : https://t.co/8uJJtJgG1V
Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. (2021). #Plantbased #Vegan #ClimateCrisis #FoodSystems https://t.co/FvPOmbKlwp
RT @TomBryChevalier: @thomas_guenole @franceinfo @L214 Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions dir…
Farming contributes about 35% of global emissions. Animal farming is more than half that. It is not a trivial component of global carbon production. https://t.co/eK1quFJdcj
@EPorteneuve @Cobra_FX_ Ce sont les bons chiffres, désolé. https://t.co/WCcr5TW4Tt
"abolir la consommation de viande et de poisson"! J ai déjà vu ça dans des documentaires historiques.
RT @TomBryChevalier: Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azot…
RT @TomBryChevalier: Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azot…
RT @TomBryChevalier: @thomas_guenole @franceinfo @L214 Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions dir…
RT @TomBryChevalier: Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azot…
RT @TomBryChevalier: Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azot…
RT @TomBryChevalier: Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azot…
C'est un peu la pratique mise en place sur wikipédia non ?
RT @TomBryChevalier: Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azot…
RT @TomBryChevalier: Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azot…
RT @PenissonRemi: Ça bidonne des outils de fact check maintenant 🤡
Ça bidonne des outils de fact check maintenant 🤡
RT @TomBryChevalier: Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azot…
@thomas_guenole @franceinfo @L214 Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azote) et pas celles liées au changement de terre par ex. L'estimation de 20 % de @thomas_guenole est appuyé
Cette note de contexte est eronnée puisqu'elle ne comptabilise que les émissions directes (méthane et protoxyde d'azote) et pas celles liées au changement de terre par ex. L'estimation de 20 % de @thomas_guenole est appuyée par des sources sérieuses. https
RT @mdcmveenman: (8/14) veroorzaakte uitstoot van broeikasgassen toe te schrijven aan de veehouderij. Een onderzoek uit 2021 (https://t.co/…
(8/14) veroorzaakte uitstoot van broeikasgassen toe te schrijven aan de veehouderij. Een onderzoek uit 2021 (https://t.co/3YNeYBc1xR) toonde daarnaast aan dat twee keer zoveel broeikasgassen geproduceerd
@JamesMelville One of the biggest threats is misinformation of people with influence just like you. You aren’t a climate scientist or anything related. https://t.co/qKCSUnzsCt https://t.co/E4xXAczjdQ https://t.co/se8HQrxXta https://t.co/d19BUaCns3 ht
1) ANIMAL AGRICULTURE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 57% OF FOOD EMISSIONS 📈💨 The huge demand for meat and dairy products produces a staggering percentage of our global food emissions that go on to pollute our atmosphere. Source: https://t.co/nzRKI02J9I
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
Als je een melkkoe inruilt voor rijstvelden lijkt de winst er op het eerste oog niet te zijn.. benieuwd naar uitkomsten.. https://t.co/CD9QNLi32P https://t.co/Puc7DBS9KI
RT @KHayhoe: @shoot2scoot Hi Chris, I'm a scientist who studies methane. It's actually 28x more powerful than CO2 using a 100 year time fra…
RT @KHayhoe: @shoot2scoot Hi Chris, I'm a scientist who studies methane. It's actually 28x more powerful than CO2 using a 100 year time fra…
RT @KHayhoe: @shoot2scoot Hi Chris, I'm a scientist who studies methane. It's actually 28x more powerful than CO2 using a 100 year time fra…
@shoot2scoot Hi Chris, I'm a scientist who studies methane. It's actually 28x more powerful than CO2 using a 100 year time frame, but animal ag emissions make up 19% of total CO2 eq emissions. Source: https://t.co/q1Bb0FGh4n
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: We’re in deep denial of the greenhouse gas impacts. The latest estimate, in Nature Food, gives livestock consumption’s d…
@Cliffhuckers This has been known for quite a while, remember the controversy over the green new deal and hamburgers? Here’s some links on it: https://t.co/12zU1x28vj https://t.co/PU0ffAVUrz https://t.co/Y9wudBswwB https://t.co/5L4FP2rLYG I hope this hel
@tobi21530 @MeggGawat @LakotaMan1 For example, 57% of greenhouse gas emissions from food production comes from animal-based food. https://t.co/McotAXFIHK
@conservative559 @PlantBasedNews @elonmusk Alright, that's a fair analysis you provide there. Please forgive me for using inaccurate and exaggerated data, however animal agriculture still produces more greenhouse gas emissions than crop production itself w
RT @JrBelefonte: @WarrenDavidson By sociopathic influence he means science . By globalists he means… well, you know. https://t.co/vV2NgeTV…
@WarrenDavidson By sociopathic influence he means science . By globalists he means… well, you know. https://t.co/vV2NgeTVVR
@turbotechdog @Rob_Percival_ @india_bourke 20% in the high quality study mentioned below https://t.co/CgWGHbHT9a (https://t.co/bscmCSgAQw)
@AWP_BackCountry @jan_dutkiewicz @turbotechdog This recent study https://t.co/bscmCSgAQw, for instance, provides good estimates of the share of total GHG emissions from the food sector: around 35%+ (for free access, try https://t.co/luN16Mye0j)
@johnmccourt000 @JohnRanford @AldiUK Here you go then, I assume the journal Nature is good enough. Then again this information isn’t exactly hard to find https://t.co/nTHQQv5iN3
RT @AnnieLeymarie: I believe there might be a typo in this tweet, as livestock emissions are widely considered to be at least 14.5% of tota…
I believe there might be a typo in this tweet, as livestock emissions are widely considered to be at least 14.5% of total emissions (as per FAO), or more (e.g. https://t.co/bscmCSgAQw). And the Conversation article is here: https://t.co/uOggUfT7pv
@Newtonomics1 @ProfMarkMaslin @ProfSteveKeen Got a source for that? Food is 25-30% emissions, animal ag is 57% of that, so 16% total emissions. Add in land use change, benefits of rewilding 50-70% Farm land and going veggie gains are massive. Big Mac
RT @SasoDolenc: Skupne globalne emisije zaradi proizvodnje živil živalskega izvora pa so dvakrat večje od emisij zaradi proizvodnje živil r…
Skupne globalne emisije zaradi proizvodnje živil živalskega izvora pa so dvakrat večje od emisij zaradi proizvodnje živil rastlinskega izvora. Četrtina emisij toplogrednih plinov v živilski industriji je po tem viru posledica proizvodnje govejega mesa. htt
@erra_reportajes @AndrexLinares Como aplaudes solo lo que quieres oír, te ha picado tanto la curiosidad de la conversación que me has acabado desbloqueando, si quieres el resto de referencias, cuanto contrastes esas, te las mando
@AndrexLinares @erra_reportajes Toma anda, empieza a leer.
@ActiveRational @AgentDarkBooty3 @MeggGawat @OTerrifying https://t.co/Oow9Cs7oWU and somewhere in this thread I linked a website which showed that Nature. com has a low/if any chance of bias.
@fvrmix And you make a living from lying to people. The latest estimate gives livestock consumption’s emissions as 9.9Gt CO2eq yr−1. 20% of total global emissions. By contrast, global transport produces 7.2Gt https://t.co/YHiy9LrJbT
@AgentDarkBooty3 @MeggGawat @OTerrifying For example, https://t.co/Oow9Cs7oWU reliable website, article containing only facts, and heres a community review on the website's biases (center aka it is not biased/trivially biased) https://t.co/RMQnbM1zVx