↓ Skip to main content

Self-care tooling innovation in a disabled kea (Nestor notabilis)

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
33 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
261 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Self-care tooling innovation in a disabled kea (Nestor notabilis)
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-97086-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amalia P. M. Bastos, Kata Horváth, Jonathan L. Webb, Patrick M. Wood, Alex H. Taylor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 261 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Psychology 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 486. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#32,954
of 19,183,540 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#503
of 103,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,123
of 307,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,183,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.