かなり前に話題になり、疑義が呈されていたStay at-home policyに効果がなかったというScientific Reportの論文が撤回されたようです。
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: 18/n Huge news - the paper is RETRACTED https://t.co/LahUtVewif
RT @GidMK: 18/n Huge news - the paper is RETRACTED https://t.co/LahUtVewif
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
18/n Huge news - the paper is RETRACTED https://t.co/LahUtVewif
Se RETRACTA un artículo, bastante visitado, que concluía q las políticas de aislamiento en casa no disminuían las muertes covid19
Sigh.
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @dr_barrett: @GidMK This was dodgy as hell from get go on major issue no lag time ... @sinichol and @slodge and I did an impromtu assess…
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
Hugely cited paper claiming that stay-at-home policies are useless has been retracted. Chissà cosa diranno quelli dei pianerottoli. @gianlucac1 @ThManfredi @dianacalibana @giorgiogilestro
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
The paper that claimed "LOCKDOWNS don't prevent Covid deaths" is being RETRACTED.
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
👉👉👉
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
RT @GidMK: BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
BIG NEWS The paper has been retracted. Retraction notice not yet online https://t.co/V0qX5aOXFr https://t.co/5ARKu1do7O
@LeftMaja_123 Lockdown : https://t.co/GQuGO8miEd
El 5 de marzo del 2021 se publicó un estudio en scientific reports donde se concluia: ", we were not able to explain if COVID-19 mortality is reduced by staying at home in ~ 98% of the comparisons after epidemiological weeks 9 to 34." https://t.co/qL1yEs
@GidMK This was dodgy as hell from get go on major issue no lag time ... @sinichol and @slodge and I did an impromtu assessment on the fly at the time. @SciReports unfortunately has published a lot of bad papers on covid
https://t.co/TPNobD73nk "Only 63 (1.6%) comparisons were significant. With our results, we were not able to explain if COVID-19 mortality is reduced by staying at home in ~ 98% of the comparisons after epidemiological weeks 9 to 34."
@joao_ribeiro @gaddamnbruh Deixo aqui alguns estudos do Facebook da tia Amélia e de um gajo que faz vacinas para cavalos :) https://t.co/pczygZ1mTR https://t.co/ARq5Z1Ecj2 https://t.co/woWW3ILZRp https://t.co/QXvjxCqum0 https://t.co/u2iP1rKxXs https://t.co
@Beyond_GenomEra @wahidalqarna @DrNathanCole @CristinaZuniga1 Ihre Studie bzgl. Lockdown stellt keinen kausalen Zusammenhang dar. Bei Ausblendung d. Kausalität kann ich auch eine einwandfreie Studie darüber schreiben, dass Eis essen Sonnenbrand verursacht
RT @revoltes: Les confinements n'ont eu aucune utilité (source: Nature). Par contre ces mesures liberticides moyenâgeuses et inutiles ont…
@Crusty20041 @MarcoSchlaepfer @ronron_1986 @Die_Kehrseite @NoldiSchweizer @nachrichten_at @AmUetliberg @AEscher1291 @hardmanpolitics @pierrech @ToscanRalph @IsabelVillalon1 @LisaWitzig55 @fredymeury Hier ein kleiner teil aus meinem Telegram Kanal. Und? Ist
@brembs @PhilJaeker @GrundMar > ich habe mir immer die Situation weltweit angeschaut, und gerade in Argentinien, Peru und ganz Afrika gab es wohl keinen Zusammenhang (auch keine Alternativerklärungen). Dabei sind Lockdowns klar gesundheitsschädlich... h
@dogterom_jan @ClaireM707 @FloorMilikowski @kimvankeken Ik herhaal: je zit duidelijk in een lage informatiestaat. Ik snap dat dit ook tot een identiteitscrisis kan leiden maar lees bijvoorbeeld deze studie uit nature. Ik ben overigens ook een data scientis
@bsagt @fdpbt Vielleicht meint er solche Studien, die aber natürlich nicht konklusiv sind (es gibt wohl wenig gute Forschung dazu): https://t.co/shiIhm7l4w, https://t.co/8B753rsyjy,
@MathieuCasanov4 @MarieFernet Il y a des articles scientifiques qui devraient être connu du pouvoir, qui démontrent que les confinements sont totalement inutiles voir nuisibles, elles portent sur 87 pays et régions et ça n'a rien à voir avec votre bagnole
@Musician1980 Lindner hat Recht, die wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse sprechen gegen Lockdowns: https://t.co/vNfG8Eh4Ed
@Jssi_L Hier trotzdem ein paar Studien, Wissen schadet nicht: https://t.co/vNfG8Eh4Ed
#Lindner heute mal wieder based [1][2][3]. 1. https://t.co/FmC82WsHls 2. https://t.co/TRqaBxjOxY 3. https://t.co/AR5cwjAtem
@IttiIttiman @Clannad992 @Karl_Lauterbach Ach ja schauen wir d doch mal Australien Neuseeland krachend gescheitert. https://t.co/DePigQassq oder https://t.co/QIIaqcCbcz oder https://t.co/ysXfV5fbH2
@johananderberg @unherd Lockdown stringency not correlated with COVID mortality: This study from March 2021 compared Google's mobility data with COVID mortality across many countries. It generally did not find them to be correlated: https://t.co/HJkXixk
@Matti88098806 @michaelgoehring @Karl_Lauterbach Na immer noch nicht verstanden der lockdown war sinnfrei ? https://t.co/QIIaqcCbcz oder https://t.co/mD7xxuazHa & jetzt noch mal 20ß mit 21 vergleichen
@grodaeu Well, there was this theory... 🤷♂️ https://t.co/RN7HU15351
@MoladHayo @Nehemia_GA @IL_police https://t.co/Fl2OvcEtTY מחקר עצום של כתב עמיתים ומוכיח שהסגרים לא תרמו מאומה. אני רק שאלה, בשם מאות אלפי רופאים, אפידמיולוגים, וירולוגים, ביולוגים, שאר מדענים שפוטרו או התפטרו מעבודתם ברחבי העולם בשל אי הסכמתם עם הנעשה. הם
RT @mipardudire: El estudio + grande a la fecha, publicado en Nature sobre movilidad en 138 países señala q no hay evidencia alguna d q la…
RT @mipardudire: El estudio + grande a la fecha, publicado en Nature sobre movilidad en 138 países señala q no hay evidencia alguna d q la…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @EGarca8: Esto por Dios...ESTO👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
RT @EGarca8: Esto por Dios...ESTO👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
Esto por Dios...ESTO👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
@profesterman @Chrisbilbo https://t.co/Wy8vRPbZjJ Interesting look at the impact (or lack thereof) of stay-at-home policies.
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
RT @despertarsano: NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://…
NATURE: Política de “quédate en casa” es un caso de FALÁCIA DE EXCEPCIÓN Full article: https://t.co/noW7GOgGp9 https://t.co/8peKYV6AyQ
El tiempo deja cada vez mas en evidencia que la pobre (¿compleja?) correlación de la movilidad con el impacto de la pandemia. https://t.co/SsZijx3AkZ
@Piotr_Malecki @AnnaSiarkowska @a_niedzielski @MZ_GOV_PL Panie Piotrze, lockdown to niewyobrażalna pomyłka. Te decyzje zabiły (i zabiją) więcej ludzi niż sam wirus https://t.co/TSxoPiSYTi https://t.co/iR2AkZflPf https://t.co/BIKewSMw3f https://t.co/3a5FvYE
RT @SignorErnesto: @AniMatMigrante @andrea_maccagni @UKITAEU @AndreaRoventini @marattin perchè non inviti questo tuo conterraneo e ci fai d…
@AniMatMigrante @andrea_maccagni @UKITAEU @AndreaRoventini @marattin perchè non inviti questo tuo conterraneo e ci fai due chiacchere? https://t.co/jDBWdhC8qb
Il lockdown in Brasile ha causato un innalzamento dei contagi(le favelas non sono un luogo salubre se ti ci chiudono dentro) Qui Savaris su Nature Scientific Reports. https://t.co/42FVVhnjdi Evidentemente Andrea non ha letto l'artico di Repubblica. E scriv
@borghi_claudio @Emanuel47103740 GP solo ed unicamente per chi lavora a contatto con fragili, anziani, in strutture ospedaliere e RSA, tamponi a prezzo di costo (nessuno ci deve rimettere) mascherine su trasporto pubblico e luoghi affollati. Cancellare per
@steveross75 @cominif Guardi, non accetto simili modi di porsi. Io discuto molto pacatamente. Argomento. Io sono vaccinato. L'argomento era tutt'altro. Il #greenpass non ha nulla a che vedere con il vaccino, tanto meno il lockdown. la scienza è il mio faro
@HelioSbf @rlmaldon @gui_carvalho @kllebes @gugachacra Este estudo da Nature mostra que lockdown é ineficaz para conter a circulação do vírus. https://t.co/j8kEEb9fXi
@waitingfortrump @Ronaldo99494174 @andre_cunha @realpfigueiredo Este estudo da Nature contesta o lockdown. https://t.co/j8kEEaRF5K