↓ Skip to main content

Metachronal waves in magnetic micro-robotic paddles for artificial cilia

Overview of attention for article published in Communications Materials, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Metachronal waves in magnetic micro-robotic paddles for artificial cilia
Published in
Communications Materials, February 2021
DOI 10.1038/s43246-021-00120-7
Authors

Matthew T. Bryan, Elizabeth L. Martin, Aleksandra Pac, Andrew D. Gilbert, Feodor Y. Ogrin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#10,248,855
of 17,499,602 outputs
Outputs from Communications Materials
#100
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,416
of 324,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Materials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,499,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them