The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The antimicrobial potential of cannabidiol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Communications Biology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s42003-020-01530-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark A. T. Blaskovich, Angela M. Kavanagh, Alysha G. Elliott, Bing Zhang, Soumya Ramu, Maite Amado, Gabrielle J. Lowe, Alexandra O. Hinton, Do Minh Thu Pham, Johannes Zuegg, Neil Beare, Diana Quach, Marc D. Sharp, Joe Pogliano, Ashleigh P. Rogers, Dena Lyras, Lendl Tan, Nicholas P. West, David W. Crawford, Marnie L. Peterson, Matthew Callahan, Michael Thurn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 9% |
| Canada | 8 | 5% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Finland | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 113 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 146 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 7% |
| Scientists | 13 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 326 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 132 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 140 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 900. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#20,687
of 26,556,052 outputs
Outputs from Communications Biology
#24
of 6,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#805
of 540,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Biology
#2
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,052 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 540,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.