“Think about the climate system like the Titanic. It’s hard to turn the ship when you see the icebergs.” -Andrew Dressler, an author on this new study @NatureClimate: https://t.co/OTjLiMOfJ1
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
Greater committed warming after accounting for the pattern effect | Nature Climate Change https://t.co/ANr4ehFNp0
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
@DavidLWindt This study certainly shifts the balance in the wrong direction... https://t.co/mqfGEQrjMv
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
Greater committed warming after accounting for the pattern effect | Nature Climate Change https://t.co/6MlXUKwsZK
RT @Beyond_Climate: これまでの二酸化炭素排出量だけで、将来的に1℃から1.5℃の気温上昇が見込まれるという研究結果。つまり、パリ協定の目標である1.5℃と2℃を超えて、産業革命前よりも2.3℃から2.8℃気温が上昇すると。でも、そこに達するには数世紀以上かか…
RT @Lacertko: Committed warming strikes again. @theresphysics https://t.co/mqfGEQ9IUX
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
Committed warming strikes again. @theresphysics https://t.co/mqfGEQ9IUX
RT @Beyond_Climate: これまでの二酸化炭素排出量だけで、将来的に1℃から1.5℃の気温上昇が見込まれるという研究結果。つまり、パリ協定の目標である1.5℃と2℃を超えて、産業革命前よりも2.3℃から2.8℃気温が上昇すると。でも、そこに達するには数世紀以上かか…
RT @Beyond_Climate: これまでの二酸化炭素排出量だけで、将来的に1℃から1.5℃の気温上昇が見込まれるという研究結果。つまり、パリ協定の目標である1.5℃と2℃を超えて、産業革命前よりも2.3℃から2.8℃気温が上昇すると。でも、そこに達するには数世紀以上かか…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
Une nouvelle étude montre que l’accroissement en gaz à effet de serre carbone déjà présente dans l'air va faire monter les températures mondiales à environ 2,3°C de réchauffement depuis l'époque préindustrielle. https://t.co/GXhvdPpAKr
RT @Beyond_Climate: これまでの二酸化炭素排出量だけで、将来的に1℃から1.5℃の気温上昇が見込まれるという研究結果。つまり、パリ協定の目標である1.5℃と2℃を超えて、産業革命前よりも2.3℃から2.8℃気温が上昇すると。でも、そこに達するには数世紀以上かか…
We are already committed to unacceptable warming. It's too late for net zero alone. It's time for #ClimateRestoration #RestoreOurClimate
Very good explainer on committed warming (assuming no change in concentration) and the role of the Southern Ocean therein. It's about this new paper by Zhou et al: https://t.co/r7Ks4qi0sX
RT @Beyond_Climate: これまでの二酸化炭素排出量だけで、将来的に1℃から1.5℃の気温上昇が見込まれるという研究結果。つまり、パリ協定の目標である1.5℃と2℃を超えて、産業革命前よりも2.3℃から2.8℃気温が上昇すると。でも、そこに達するには数世紀以上かか…
Als een klimaat wetenschapper een chagrijnige dag heeft 👇ipv zn nette wetenschap uitlatingen. Dan hoor je waar ie echt boos over is. Weet jij al wat die klimaatopwarming betekent, voor jouw kind als die 80 is?
RT @Beyond_Climate: これまでの二酸化炭素排出量だけで、将来的に1℃から1.5℃の気温上昇が見込まれるという研究結果。つまり、パリ協定の目標である1.5℃と2℃を超えて、産業革命前よりも2.3℃から2.8℃気温が上昇すると。でも、そこに達するには数世紀以上かか…
RT @Beyond_Climate: これまでの二酸化炭素排出量だけで、将来的に1℃から1.5℃の気温上昇が見込まれるという研究結果。つまり、パリ協定の目標である1.5℃と2℃を超えて、産業革命前よりも2.3℃から2.8℃気温が上昇すると。でも、そこに達するには数世紀以上かか…
これまでの二酸化炭素排出量だけで、将来的に1℃から1.5℃の気温上昇が見込まれるという研究結果。つまり、パリ協定の目標である1.5℃と2℃を超えて、産業革命前よりも2.3℃から2.8℃気温が上昇すると。でも、そこに達するには数世紀以上かかるから、とにかく排出量を早くゼロにすればいいとのこと。
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @EngrRahman42: Any target relating environmental issues are not seeming to be met in near future as no country men looking to take up th…
Excellent work! Thanks for the research my take-home message well summarised here⤵️ https://t.co/xrr2Uffqg6
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
btw, here's a non-paywalled link to the paper: https://t.co/mZbNsMvxEq
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
@Greenpeace Here you go https://t.co/AjuiVFSSNy
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @EngrRahman42: Any target relating environmental issues are not seeming to be met in near future as no country men looking to take up th…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
@MichaelEMann @SteveHanleyRI @cleantechnica At the same day we got this, saying about greater committed warming. Which one is correct? https://t.co/ntkQN6RDL9
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
The logic is more airtight in the paper than in the tweet 🧐🤣
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
@ClimateHuman @AndrewDessler @hausfath also has a nice write up of the paper. From my understanding, it doesn’t add much to the pessimism - though more uncertainty than before seem to expected.
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
Our planet’s energy balance is sensitive to spatial inhomogeneities in sea surface temperature and sea ice changes, but this is typically ignored in climate projections. https://t.co/ekBKyJRGKC
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateBen: 😠 Committed warning from emissions that have already occurred has a most likely value of 2.3- 2.8°C. 😠 How many more years…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…