Hay que leer este hilo, con precisiones clave. Pero el mensaje principal se mantiene: alcanzar cero emisiones netas para 2050 podría no ser suficiente para limitar el aumento de temp a 1.5C. La incertidumbre científica debería impulsar mayor ambición climá
This is a must-read, precision is key. But the main message stands: net-zero by 2050 might not cut it if we want to limit global temp rise to 1.5ºC. If anything, under the precautionary principle, scientific uncertainty should lead to higher ambition, not
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @_richardblack: Good thread, thanks Zeke
RT @ClimateHuman: This is an important paper, and also an excellent example of sci-comm from @AndrewDessler. Unfortunately it's bad news. C…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
Lots of great, albeit alarming info in here.
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
@SteveSilent @GretaThunberg @FrediOtto @vanessa_vash @FFF_Africa @FFFIndia @FFFAmazonia @FFFMAPA @JoeriRogelj @MichaelEMann @60Minutes @CBS @ClimateLive2021 @TIME @UE @FT @NewsHour 🔝Thank you👍...that's a Great x9-Thread❣️ I Love that inclusion/consideratio
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
Good thread, thanks Zeke
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
GretaThunberg: https://t.co/sZWbLjIr83
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
Good thread too.
RT @AndrewDessler: I'm a co-author on a new paper about committed warming! @mzelinka is a co-author, so you know it's good! https://t.co/…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @drvolts: Turns out (shockingly) the findings & implications of this paper are much more complicated & nuanced than conveyed in the AP s…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
@BluecifersWrath @DonPaul4weather @TheBuffaloNews A LOT of skepticism about this new study. Thread here: https://t.co/KAsjY69tye see also: https://t.co/M14BYeDbHE
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @drvolts: Turns out (shockingly) the findings & implications of this paper are much more complicated & nuanced than conveyed in the AP s…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @drvolts: Turns out (shockingly) the findings & implications of this paper are much more complicated & nuanced than conveyed in the AP s…
one of the fascinating elements of climate modelling is that the models are good at medium term but not annual. that does mean often you're playing detective to work out where that theoretical heat / CO2 has gone - it tends to bring better refinements to m
@hausfath I hadn’t seen your earlier thread. Very helpful explanations.
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @drvolts: Turns out (shockingly) the findings & implications of this paper are much more complicated & nuanced than conveyed in the AP s…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
RT @hausfath: Fascinating new paper by @AndrewDessler and colleagues arguing committed warming might be higher than expected given historic…
If you've seen a new headline stating that the world can't avoid the Paris temperature limits, read this. The new research behind that headline is nuanced, and easily misinterpreted.
RT @drvolts: Turns out (shockingly) the findings & implications of this paper are much more complicated & nuanced than conveyed in the AP s…
@ClimateAdam @RichardJ_Millar @Peters_Glen Yes and no. "Commitment" in the paper is indeed constant concentrations. However, some of the reported effect is due to changes in warming patterns (& cloud fdbck) when going from a transient to equilibrium.
Turns out (shockingly) the findings & implications of this paper are much more complicated & nuanced than conveyed in the AP story. Check out Zeke's thread for the gory details: https://t.co/sicgbRaeMb
@ClimateAdam @JoeriRogelj @RichardJ_Millar Zeke has it covered... https://t.co/I6CvaoWScg
@drvolts Thats not actually the case. What the paper says is that if we hold CO2 and other GHG concentrations constant (e.g. do not get emissions all the way down to zero), we may end up with 2C+ warming eventually. https://t.co/jJ8g3vso2k
climate scientist friends - am I right in thinking this paper makes the (same old) mistake of assuming concentrations stay fixed after emissions stop? https://t.co/Qey6g3nj3X
... podrían suponer entre un 0.2-0.5 ºC de calentamiento más incluso en un escenario de cero emisiones https://t.co/noLOGjG4ga
👇Excellent thread, makes Twitter feel useful once in a while 😉