↓ Skip to main content

Diverse architectural properties of Sso10a proteins: Evidence for a role in chromatin compaction and organization

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Diverse architectural properties of Sso10a proteins: Evidence for a role in chromatin compaction and organization
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep29422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalie P. C. Driessen, Szu-Ning Lin, Willem-Jan Waterreus, Alson L. H. van der Meulen, Ramon A. van der Valk, Niels Laurens, Geri F. Moolenaar, Navraj S. Pannu, Gijs J. L. Wuite, Nora Goosen, Remus T. Dame

Abstract

Sso10a proteins are small DNA-binding proteins expressed by the crenarchaeal model organism Sulfolobus solfataricus. Based on the structure of Sso10a1, which contains a winged helix-turn-helix motif, it is believed that Sso10a proteins function as sequence-specific transcription factors. Here we show that Sso10a1 and Sso10a2 exhibit different distinct DNA-binding modes. While the ability to bend DNA is shared between the two proteins, DNA bridging is observed only for Sso10a1 and only Sso10a2 exhibits filament formation along DNA. The architectural properties of Sso10a proteins suggest that these proteins fulfil generic roles in chromatin organization and compaction. As these proteins exhibit different binding behaviour depending on their DNA binding stoichiometry, altered levels of expression in the cell can be exploited to drive changes in local genome folding, which may operate to modulate transcription.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Lecturer 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 39%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,661,887
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#61,080
of 127,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,271
of 356,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,702
of 3,671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.