| Title |
Soil inoculation steers restoration of terrestrial ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Plants, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nplants.2016.107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. R. Jasper Wubs, Wim H. van der Putten, Machiel Bosch, T. Martijn Bezemer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 66% |
| Scientists | 20 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 581 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 572 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 116 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 82 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 12% |
| Unknown | 109 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 216 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 134 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Unknown | 147 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#276,114
of 25,482,409 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#135
of 2,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,488
of 370,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,482,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.