RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of peo…
This is why we should get our science from peer-reviewed journals, not Netflix documentaries. Unfortunately, lots of people watched the docs, and now believe that cattle are carbon-neutral or even carbon-negative if reared properly. Here's the paper https:
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
Bonne idée, cela permettrait encore d'augmenter les impôts sous couvert d'une bonne intention, sans même avoir besoin de faire semblant de chercher une utilisation pertinente de leur fruit.
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
2 quick thoughts on this: 1) by the time the true climate cost of food production is applied, meat and dairy prices will rise significantly. Need just transition. 2) organic meat production really has no climate benefit over conventional meat production. h
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
Organisch vlees heeft dezelfde ecologische voetafdruk als gewoon vlees. Ondertussen bij EX-Rebellion: Houston, we have a problem! https://t.co/8czZ45LXMI
Interesting new article in Nature Communications that quantifies the differences between organic and conventional methods of animal farming. https://t.co/68M9iL6MRZ
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
A descarbonização não pode ficar pela energia (o que não quer dizer que não se acelere também desse lado)
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @Gregdt1: Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’e…
Et si le coût de production des aliments prenait en compte les externalités climatiques ? Quel serait le surcoût associé ? C’est le sujet d’une étude publiée par 3 chercheurs allemands dans Nature Communications. (open access) https://t.co/mdYIAiTgys
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
Great idea (not new, but with numbers attached). A majority of the population would agree that “we need to tackle climate change”. But how many are willing to accept a (small) change in behaviour for that to happen, and how many expect the “Government” to
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @barissanli: Yavaş yavaş iklim değişikliği tüketicinin etrafını sarmaya başlıyor. İklime zararını da fiyatlamak için kırmızı et fiyatı e…
Yavaş yavaş iklim değişikliği tüketicinin etrafını sarmaya başlıyor. İklime zararını da fiyatlamak için kırmızı et fiyatı en az 2 misli pahalı olmalı...Bilimsel sonuç
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
One for @LeilaniMunter ?
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
Must-read on the huge impact of meat on #climatechange and how to use pricing to address the problem.
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
RT @AukeHoekstra: New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage in…
New open access publication in Nature concludes: meat should be more than twice as expensive if we take climate damage into account. short thread https://t.co/4K41cPVohS ht @JMoVS https://t.co/AERr7vgq7d
Worth reading for those considering #REGENUARY. It’s a shame that Regenuary is pitched directly against #Veganuary as the goals of the two aren’t all that different, one is just more credible. Direct article link: https://t.co/vDn9La9dCD
@bauderlicque @paysansaturnien Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products étude publiée dans la revue Nature le 15 décembre 2020, menée par l’Université technique de Munich (Allemagne) sur https://t.co/I
RT @SlothKristian: Konventionelt kød skulle være 146% dyrere, hvis produktionens eksterne klimaomkostninger indregnes i prisen. Det viser n…
@abennassar Resum: productes ramaders (ecològics o no) tenen un impacte major (en el cas de la carn de vedella en més de 150 vegades!) que els productes vegetals (ecològics o no) sobre el canvi climàtic. https://t.co/IwiG6RghJH
"Results show that external GHG costs are highest for conventional and organic animal-based products..., followed by conventional dairy products... and lowest for organic plant-based products (0.02€/kg product; 6% surcharge)." https://t.co/wtbPawcvo1
Konventionelt kød skulle være 146% dyrere, hvis produktionens eksterne klimaomkostninger indregnes i prisen. Det viser nyt stort studie. I stedet støttes kødproduktion massivt af EU og regeringen. @RasmusPrehn @DanJoergensen #dkgreen https://t.co/tvbd
'The climate damage cost caused by organic meat production is just as high as that of conventionally farmed meat in this open access paper https://t.co/AoZviH89t9 #climatechange
RT @teinij: Tuoreen tutkimuksen mukaan ruoan ulkoisvaikutusten hinnoittelu yli tuplaisi lihan hinnan, lähes tuplaisi maitotuotteiden hinnan…
https://t.co/HBvxAHPlMX Organic meat as bad for the environment as regular meat https://t.co/g3TjbGdgin via https://t.co/k6HoMEe4Ti
Stima di governo tedesco su costo di danni a clima indotti dall’allevamento:180€/tonCO2. In Germania,prezzo alla stalla di carne bovina dovrebbe essere +6€/kg per coprire costi climatici e +3€/kg per il pollo @enzofavoino @coldiretti https://t.co/iUXD