The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 439 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-19474-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maximilian Pieper, Amelie Michalke, Tobias Gaugler |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 7% |
| Finland | 31 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 6% |
| Germany | 20 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 15 | 3% |
| Spain | 14 | 3% |
| Ireland | 13 | 3% |
| France | 12 | 3% |
| Denmark | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Unknown | 209 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 374 | 85% |
| Scientists | 41 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 281 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 100 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 18 | 6% |
| Engineering | 14 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 106 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 866. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#22,385
of 26,774,700 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#446
of 63,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#821
of 533,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#12
of 1,589 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,774,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,589 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.