↓ Skip to main content

Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-19474-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximilian Pieper, Amelie Michalke, Tobias Gaugler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 473 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 60 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 8%
Engineering 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 67 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 870. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,212
of 22,603,384 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#292
of 46,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#830
of 501,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#54
of 6,081 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,603,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 501,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,081 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.