| Title |
Pluridisciplinary evidence for burial for the La Ferrassie 8 Neandertal child
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-77611-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Balzeau, Alain Turq, Sahra Talamo, Camille Daujeard, Guillaume Guérin, Frido Welker, Isabelle Crevecoeur, Helen Fewlass, Jean-Jacques Hublin, Christelle Lahaye, Bruno Maureille, Matthias Meyer, Catherine Schwab, Asier Gómez-Olivencia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 211 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 21 | 10% |
| France | 19 | 9% |
| United States | 18 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 7% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 1% |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 101 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 166 | 79% |
| Scientists | 40 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 24 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 626. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#36,192
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#571
of 142,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,252
of 528,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#24
of 4,509 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,509 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.