↓ Skip to main content

Economists’ views on the ergodicity problem

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Physics, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
138 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Economists’ views on the ergodicity problem
Published in
Nature Physics, December 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41567-020-01106-x
Authors

Jason N. Doctor, Peter P. Wakker, Tong V. Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 23%
Physics and Astronomy 6 20%
Mathematics 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#399,068
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Nature Physics
#363
of 4,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,123
of 529,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Physics
#12
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.