| Title |
Discovery of carbon nanotubes in sixth century BC potteries from Keeladi, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-76720-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manivannan Kokarneswaran, Prakash Selvaraj, Thennarasan Ashokan, Suresh Perumal, Pathikumar Sellappan, Kandhasamy Durai Murugan, Sivanantham Ramalingam, Nagaboopathy Mohan, Vijayanand Chandrasekaran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 38 | 30% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 68 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 91% |
| Scientists | 8 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 14 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 242. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#159,717
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,934
of 143,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,394
of 435,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#71
of 4,562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.