↓ Skip to main content

Efficient production of multi-modified pigs for xenotransplantation by ‘combineering’, gene stacking and gene editing

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Efficient production of multi-modified pigs for xenotransplantation by ‘combineering’, gene stacking and gene editing
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep29081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konrad Fischer, Simone Kraner-Scheiber, Björn Petersen, Beate Rieblinger, Anna Buermann, Tatiana Flisikowska, Krzysztof Flisikowski, Susanne Christan, Marlene Edlinger, Wiebke Baars, Mayuko Kurome, Valeri Zakhartchenko, Barbara Kessler, Elena Plotzki, Izabela Szczerbal, Marek Switonski, Joachim Denner, Eckhard Wolf, Reinhard Schwinzer, Heiner Niemann, Alexander Kind, Angelika Schnieke

Abstract

Xenotransplantation from pigs could alleviate the shortage of human tissues and organs for transplantation. Means have been identified to overcome hyperacute rejection and acute vascular rejection mechanisms mounted by the recipient. The challenge is to combine multiple genetic modifications to enable normal animal breeding and meet the demand for transplants. We used two methods to colocate xenoprotective transgenes at one locus, sequential targeted transgene placement - 'gene stacking', and cointegration of multiple engineered large vectors - 'combineering', to generate pigs carrying modifications considered necessary to inhibit short to mid-term xenograft rejection. Pigs were generated by serial nuclear transfer and analysed at intermediate stages. Human complement inhibitors CD46, CD55 and CD59 were abundantly expressed in all tissues examined, human HO1 and human A20 were widely expressed. ZFN or CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homozygous GGTA1 and CMAH knockout abolished α-Gal and Neu5Gc epitopes. Cells from multi-transgenic piglets showed complete protection against human complement-mediated lysis, even before GGTA1 knockout. Blockade of endothelial activation reduced TNFα-induced E-selectin expression, IFNγ-induced MHC class-II upregulation and TNFα/cycloheximide caspase induction. Microbial analysis found no PERV-C, PCMV or 13 other infectious agents. These animals are a major advance towards clinical porcine xenotransplantation and demonstrate that livestock engineering has come of age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,484,038
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#14,136
of 126,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,834
of 353,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#440
of 3,739 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,739 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.