Title |
Pre-validation of a MALDI MS proteomics-based method for the reliable detection of blood and blood provenance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-74253-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katie Kennedy, Cameron Heaton, Glenn Langenburg, Laura Cole, Tom Clark, Malcolm R. Clench, Vaughn Sears, Mark Sealey, Richard McColm, Simona Francese |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
Germany | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Mexico | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 28% |
Chemistry | 3 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Materials Science | 2 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,032,493
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#31,623
of 125,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,615
of 415,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,219
of 4,517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.