Title |
Evidence corroborates identity of isolated fossil feather as a wing covert of Archaeopteryx
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-65336-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryan M. Carney, Helmut Tischlinger, Matthew D. Shawkey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 8 | 9% |
United States | 7 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
Japan | 4 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 1% |
Philippines | 1 | 1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 54 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 78 | 83% |
Scientists | 13 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 387. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#80,578
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,095
of 142,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,572
of 433,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#36
of 4,173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.