The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Evidence corroborates identity of isolated fossil feather as a wing covert of Archaeopteryx
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-65336-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan M. Carney, Helmut Tischlinger, Matthew D. Shawkey |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 9% |
| Spain | 8 | 9% |
| Japan | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Thailand | 2 | 2% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 84% |
| Scientists | 12 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#84,935
of 26,637,793 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,142
of 148,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,638
of 437,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#36
of 4,194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,637,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.