↓ Skip to main content

Evidence corroborates identity of isolated fossil feather as a wing covert of Archaeopteryx

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
94 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Evidence corroborates identity of isolated fossil feather as a wing covert of Archaeopteryx
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-65336-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan M. Carney, Helmut Tischlinger, Matthew D. Shawkey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#82,522
of 26,188,345 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,116
of 145,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,611
of 436,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#36
of 4,182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,188,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.