| Title |
Evidence corroborates identity of isolated fossil feather as a wing covert of Archaeopteryx
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-65336-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan M. Carney, Helmut Tischlinger, Matthew D. Shawkey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| Japan | 5 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Thailand | 2 | 2% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 52 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 83% |
| Scientists | 13 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#86,222
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,117
of 135,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,754
of 417,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#41
of 4,115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.