| Title |
Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2772-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald J. Benton, Antoni G. Wrobel, Pengqi Xu, Chloë Roustan, Stephen R. Martin, Peter B. Rosenthal, John J. Skehel, Steven J. Gamblin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 18% |
| India | 7 | 4% |
| Japan | 7 | 4% |
| Spain | 6 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 79 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 107 | 63% |
| Scientists | 52 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 607 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 607 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 12% |
| Researcher | 68 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 75 | 12% |
| Unknown | 204 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 154 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 47 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 33 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 77 | 13% |
| Unknown | 229 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 252. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#151,348
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#9,568
of 99,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,642
of 431,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#250
of 811 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 811 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.