| Title |
Self-supported Pt–CoO networks combining high specific activity with high surface area for oxygen reduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Materials, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41563-020-0775-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gustav W. Sievers, Anders W. Jensen, Jonathan Quinson, Alessandro Zana, Francesco Bizzotto, Mehtap Oezaslan, Alexandra Dworzak, Jacob J. K. Kirkensgaard, Thomas E. L. Smitshuysen, Shima Kadkhodazadeh, Mikkel Juelsholt, Kirsten M. Ø. Jensen, Kirsten Anklam, Hao Wan, Jan Schäfer, Klára Čépe, María Escudero-Escribano, Jan Rossmeisl, Antje Quade, Volker Brüser, Matthias Arenz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 5 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
| Scientists | 14 | 48% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 176 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Professor | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 43 | 24% |
| Materials Science | 23 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Energy | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#230,278
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#129
of 4,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,045
of 406,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.