↓ Skip to main content

The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
131 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1280-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malte Jochum, Markus Fischer, Forest Isbell, Christiane Roscher, Fons van der Plas, Steffen Boch, Gerhard Boenisch, Nina Buchmann, Jane A. Catford, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Anne Ebeling, Nico Eisenhauer, Gerd Gleixner, Norbert Hölzel, Jens Kattge, Valentin H. Klaus, Till Kleinebecker, Markus Lange, Gaëtane Le Provost, Sebastian T. Meyer, Rafael Molina-Venegas, Liesje Mommer, Yvonne Oelmann, Caterina Penone, Daniel Prati, Peter B. Reich, Abiel Rindisbacher, Deborah Schäfer, Stefan Scheu, Bernhard Schmid, David Tilman, Teja Tscharntke, Anja Vogel, Cameron Wagg, Alexandra Weigelt, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Wolfgang Wilcke, Peter Manning

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 37%
Environmental Science 45 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 43 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 226. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#107,233
of 19,876,564 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#252
of 1,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,945
of 312,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#14
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,876,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 153.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.