| Title |
A network percolation-based contagion model of flood propagation and recession in urban road networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-70524-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chao Fan, Xiangqi Jiang, Ali Mostafavi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 17 | 38% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#760,311
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#8,260
of 125,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,392
of 398,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#254
of 3,682 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,682 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.