| Title |
Marked T cell activation, senescence, exhaustion and skewing towards TH17 in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-17292-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara De Biasi, Marianna Meschiari, Lara Gibellini, Caterina Bellinazzi, Rebecca Borella, Lucia Fidanza, Licia Gozzi, Anna Iannone, Domenico Lo Tartaro, Marco Mattioli, Annamaria Paolini, Marianna Menozzi, Jovana Milić, Giacomo Franceschi, Riccardo Fantini, Roberto Tonelli, Marco Sita, Mario Sarti, Tommaso Trenti, Lucio Brugioni, Luca Cicchetti, Fabio Facchinetti, Antonello Pietrangelo, Enrico Clini, Massimo Girardis, Giovanni Guaraldi, Cristina Mussini, Andrea Cossarizza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 352 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 57 | 16% |
| Italy | 25 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 5% |
| Canada | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 187 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 297 | 84% |
| Scientists | 31 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 703 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 703 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 101 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 9% |
| Other | 45 | 6% |
| Other | 115 | 16% |
| Unknown | 210 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 109 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 99 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 70 | 10% |
| Unknown | 242 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 378. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#84,324
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,269
of 58,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,044
of 432,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#40
of 1,518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.