RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @GregDuveiller: Satellite remote sensing products can be used to monitor forest harvest intensity across the EU. 🛰️🌲 See our new paper i…
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
And here the thread ⬇️
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @biofuelwatch: Please see full thread - major increase in forest degradation in Europe since 2015, i.e. coinciding with increase in #bio…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015 | Nature/ Finlandia es un país que le da una gran importancia a la bioeconomia forestal. @EmbFinMexico @pmpohjanheimo https://t.co/jZZZTDGUtU
@raghurama123 The Welt article is based on Landsat measurements presented by Ceccherini in Nature https://t.co/0W7ZTXIjY8 They identify an expanse of the lumber market due to increasing demand and policiy changes as major factor. Surely the political will
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
#Forêts Augmentation de la superficie (49%) et de la biomasse (69%) récoltées en Europe pour la période 2016-2018 par rapport à 2011-2015. Accroissement de la taille moyenne des parcelles exploitées (34 %) https://t.co/QPRUJK717Q
RT @biofuelwatch: Please see full thread - major increase in forest degradation in Europe since 2015, i.e. coinciding with increase in #bio…
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
RT @biofuelwatch: Please see full thread - major increase in forest degradation in Europe since 2015, i.e. coinciding with increase in #bio…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
Please see full thread - major increase in forest degradation in Europe since 2015, i.e. coinciding with increase in #biomass energy.
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @Chr1stenJohn: @timbales @pientka_marleen Wetenschappers in het blad Nature laten zien hoe fout het EU biomassa beleid uitpakt. https://…
RT @enviro_matters: The #biomass argument is an absolute fallacy, residue removal starves already nutrient poor ground & leaves vast areas…
@timbales @pientka_marleen Wetenschappers in het blad Nature laten zien hoe fout het EU biomassa beleid uitpakt. https://t.co/tFatARzxYj
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
The EU’s policy to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 results in the opposite: Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Financing biomass burning speeds up CO2 increase. https://t.co/IvQdV0nNd1
If burning wood for energy only uses "residues" why have forest harvests increased so massively since subsidies for bioenergy were introduced?
RT @OysteinHeggdal: 70 % økning i hogst i Europa siden 2015, sannsynligvis som følge av økt etterspørsel etter biomasse til fornybar energi…
RT @enviro_matters: The #biomass argument is an absolute fallacy, residue removal starves already nutrient poor ground & leaves vast areas…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
70 % økning i hogst i Europa siden 2015, sannsynligvis som følge av økt etterspørsel etter biomasse til fornybar energi https://t.co/w1l42OLlQf
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @lultimoalbero: 2011 to 2018, 🇪🇺 has doubled its area of harvested forest, from 0.76 million to 1.13 million hectares Forest loss = hig…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
RT @GregDuveiller: Satellite remote sensing products can be used to monitor forest harvest intensity across the EU. 🛰️🌲 See our new paper i…
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
@lultimoalbero Does that paper also account for renaturation programs ? Ex: in my area, we really hope, that needleleaf harvest rate will be increased, precisely because the largest part of needleleaf forest is artificial and damaging. https://t.co/MQKMSAZ
RT @Fern_NGO: We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous ef…
We’ve been raising awareness of why the EU’s increased intensive logging is due to huge demand for wood and the disastrous effect it is having on #EUforests. 2 days ago, a study revealed the situation to be even grimmer than we thought. https://t.co/1ht
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
Deeply flawed "research"... Thanks to @andyheald for following this up. https://t.co/NRNNFqlpHF
RT @DreyerErwin: Well.... the lack of any validation by ground based harvest data makes this statement a little shaky. Agree that there is…
RT @DreyerErwin: Well.... the lack of any validation by ground based harvest data makes this statement a little shaky. Agree that there is…
@Skogis55 Jag hade by the way en tankelucka i min konversation, för jag funderar på frågan om avverkning och kolbindning i förhållande till denna artikel: https://t.co/V9Czxhl0z1
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
The #biomass argument is an absolute fallacy, residue removal starves already nutrient poor ground & leaves vast areas almost sterile. This results in very poor cover & soil instability, flash flooding then strips what topsoil is left. cc @biofuel
RT @rodrigofmourao1: The increased demand for #wood #products over the last years need to be followed by improved #forest #management progr…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
Gaat lekker zo: 69% minder biomassa in Europa in slechts enkele jaren https://t.co/COFRV0Ukrd https://t.co/RVOWsIpV2a
Nature article claiming large increase in harvesting of EU forests after 2015: https://t.co/SMkGwG2gJJ Comment by the Guardian: https://t.co/3F3fg85tXV Did new EU legislation come in re biomass/biofuel use from forested land after or around 2015?
RT @GregDuveiller: Satellite remote sensing products can be used to monitor forest harvest intensity across the EU. 🛰️🌲 See our new paper i…
RT @TSearchinger: Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Natur…
Biomass users often argue they are just using residues, which therefore do not increase harvests. This new paper in Nature shows a 69% increase in European harvests since EU started ramping up bioenergy. https://t.co/078GitsGub https://t.co/9IiEy32V1C
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @quevedomario: "Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015" The Guardian take: https://t.co/AK4AwIQG9k The paper:…
RT @NaukaPrzyrody: Kraje #UE (głw. Płw. Iberyjski i kraje wokoło Bałtyku) zwiększyły wycinanie swoich lasów ostatnimi laty jak wynika z ana…
RT @quevedomario: "Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015" The Guardian take: https://t.co/AK4AwIQG9k The paper:…
RT @NaukaPrzyrody: Kraje #UE (głw. Płw. Iberyjski i kraje wokoło Bałtyku) zwiększyły wycinanie swoich lasów ostatnimi laty jak wynika z ana…
"Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015" The Guardian take: https://t.co/AK4AwIQG9k The paper: https://t.co/uynQW68cAB
RT @JCSvenning: Expanding #wood markets incl #bioenergy drive abrupt increase in #forest harvesting & biomass loss in Europe - negative for…
RT @JCSvenning: Expanding #wood markets incl #bioenergy drive abrupt increase in #forest harvesting & biomass loss in Europe - negative for…
RT @JCSvenning: Expanding #wood markets incl #bioenergy drive abrupt increase in #forest harvesting & biomass loss in Europe - negative for…
"fine-scale satellite data to observe an increase in the harvested forest area (49 per cent) and an increase in biomass loss (69 per cent) over Europe for the period of 2016–2018 relative to 2011–2015" article available here: https://t.co/a6uqBIOlGk (repor
Striking increase in harvested forest area over Europe. Sweden and Finland together account for more than 50% of total increase, mainly due to forestry-related economies (bioenergy, paper) https://t.co/pUkYKcobRN https://t.co/P0ijVffiWA
"The increase in the rate of forest harvest is the result of the recent expansion of wood markets, as suggested by econometric indicators on forestry, wood-based bioenergy and international trade."
RT @milan_tomicc: Dramatic reminder that you need to choose your policy targets carefully. By chasing down renewable energy fairies Europe…
RT @DreyerErwin: Well.... the lack of any validation by ground based harvest data makes this statement a little shaky. Agree that there is…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @a_kahilainen: Jos tuntuu siltä, että Suomessa on hakattu metsää viime vuosina enemmän kuin aiemmin, niin... no, sitä on hakattu selkeäs…
RT @a_kahilainen: Jos tuntuu siltä, että Suomessa on hakattu metsää viime vuosina enemmän kuin aiemmin, niin... no, sitä on hakattu selkeäs…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
Hier der Artikel in @nature https://t.co/nUX7FLY4wP
Kraje #UE (głw. Płw. Iberyjski i kraje wokoło Bałtyku) zwiększyły wycinanie swoich lasów ostatnimi laty jak wynika z analiz satelitarnych #lasy #ekologia #Unia @Nasze_Lasy @MZmihorski @Greenpeace_PL @WWF_Polska https://t.co/j6oCWBGaJk oryginalna publ. 👉 h
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…
RT @nature: Harvested forest area and forest biomass loss increased by 49% and 69%, respectively, in Europe between 2016 and 2018, compared…