↓ Skip to main content

In vivo dual RNA-seq reveals that neutrophil recruitment underlies differential tissue tropism of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Overview of attention for article published in Communications Biology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
In vivo dual RNA-seq reveals that neutrophil recruitment underlies differential tissue tropism of Streptococcus pneumoniae
Published in
Communications Biology, June 2020
DOI 10.1038/s42003-020-1018-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vikrant Minhas, Rieza Aprianto, Lauren J. McAllister, Hui Wang, Shannon C. David, Kimberley T. McLean, Iain Comerford, Shaun R. McColl, James C. Paton, Jan-Willem Veening, Claudia Trappetti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#427,292
of 18,672,358 outputs
Outputs from Communications Biology
#264
of 2,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,098
of 298,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,672,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them