Title |
Preparing your intensive care unit for the COVID-19 pandemic: practical considerations and strategies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02916-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ken Junyang Goh, Jolin Wong, Jong-Chie Claudia Tien, Shin Yi Ng, Sewa Duu Wen, Ghee Chee Phua, Carrie Kah-Lai Leong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 6 | 43% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Austria | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 369 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 51 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 8% |
Researcher | 29 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 7% |
Other | 74 | 20% |
Unknown | 118 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
Engineering | 10 | 3% |
Other | 54 | 15% |
Unknown | 124 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,069,938
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,838
of 6,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,804
of 419,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#73
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.