↓ Skip to main content

Around the world in a month

Overview of attention for news story in Nature Biotechnology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Around the world in a month
Published by
Nature Biotechnology, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41587-020-0524-1
Pubmed ID
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,620,156
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#4,112
of 8,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,253
of 384,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#69
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.