An engineered ScCas9 with broad PAM range and high specificity and activity
Nature Biotechnology, May 2020
Pranam Chatterjee, Noah Jakimo, Jooyoung Lee, Nadia Amrani, Tomás Rodríguez, Sabrina R. T. Koseki, Emma Tysinger, Rui Qing, Shilei Hao, Erik J. Sontheimer, Joseph Jacobson
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||38||53%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||4%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||35||19%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||12||7%|
|Student > Master||10||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||9||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||68||38%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||35||19%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
of 8,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 389,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.