| Title |
Deep three-photon imaging of the brain in intact adult zebrafish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-020-0819-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawnis M. Chow, David Sinefeld, Kristine E. Kolkman, Dimitre G. Ouzounov, Najva Akbari, Rose Tatarsky, Andrew Bass, Chris Xu, Joseph R. Fetcho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 51% |
| Scientists | 18 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
| Researcher | 27 | 21% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 28 | 22% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 16% |
| Engineering | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#659,387
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#857
of 5,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,845
of 408,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#17
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.