The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 659 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Backpropagation and the brain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41583-020-0277-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timothy P. Lillicrap, Adam Santoro, Luke Marris, Colin J. Akerman, Geoffrey Hinton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 62 | 9% |
Canada | 23 | 3% |
Japan | 20 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 18 | 3% |
India | 15 | 2% |
Germany | 10 | 2% |
France | 10 | 2% |
Switzerland | 7 | 1% |
Mexico | 5 | <1% |
Other | 58 | 9% |
Unknown | 431 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 446 | 68% |
Scientists | 202 | 31% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 1% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1407 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 310 | 22% |
Researcher | 191 | 14% |
Student > Master | 166 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 117 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 3% |
Other | 184 | 13% |
Unknown | 393 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 277 | 20% |
Computer Science | 246 | 17% |
Engineering | 136 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 4% |
Psychology | 54 | 4% |
Other | 194 | 14% |
Unknown | 442 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 527. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#50,980
of 26,597,648 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#20
of 2,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,973
of 407,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,597,648 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.