| Title |
Bionic 3D printed corals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-15486-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Wangpraseurt, Shangting You, Farooq Azam, Gianni Jacucci, Olga Gaidarenko, Mark Hildebrand, Michael Kühl, Alison G. Smith, Matthew P. Davey, Alyssa Smith, Dimitri D. Deheyn, Shaochen Chen, Silvia Vignolini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| France | 6 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 60% |
| Scientists | 33 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 264 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Professor | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 76 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 11% |
| Engineering | 27 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 20 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 21% |
| Unknown | 94 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 365. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#88,661
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,321
of 58,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,140
of 402,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#27
of 1,486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.