RT @CharlieJGardner: @guyshrubsole @XRebellionUK It's true it doesn't contain a biodiversity target, but that's because biodiversity is com…
@guyshrubsole @XRebellionUK It's true it doesn't contain a biodiversity target, but that's because biodiversity is complex and can't be reduced to a single target. Targets based on preventing extinctions are reductionist and potentially counterproductive
RT @CharlieJGardner: ...we need both the diversity and abundance of life Pollinators and common trees in UK aren't endangered species, bu…
RT @CharlieJGardner: ...we need both the diversity and abundance of life Pollinators and common trees in UK aren't endangered species, bu…
...we need both the diversity and abundance of life Pollinators and common trees in UK aren't endangered species, but their declines are still worrying and costly Preventing extinctions isn't enough, we need a functioning biosphere not an ark https://t
RT @James_Borrell: Conserving biodiversity for its own sake and conserving it to safeguard ecosystem services are distinct goals that canno…
RT @James_Borrell: Conserving biodiversity for its own sake and conserving it to safeguard ecosystem services are distinct goals that canno…
Conserving biodiversity for its own sake and conserving it to safeguard ecosystem services are distinct goals that cannot both be achieved through a single target analogous to climate’s 1.5 °C, argues @AndyPurvisNHM https://t.co/am8HiHtUVz #conservation
I tend to agree, for me nature is too complex to have one target, which is what the new EU Biodiversity Strategy has several targets. All targets need to be #SMART unlike many previous "targets" which were "visions". #biodiversity
A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people, clearly explained by @AndyPurvisNHM https://t.co/ULeET1x6ia
RT @stubutchart: Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address prevent…
RT @stubutchart: Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address prevent…
RT @stubutchart: Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address prevent…
RT @stubutchart: Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address prevent…
RT @stubutchart: Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address prevent…
Really interesting thoughts here - getting to the heart of what we really value in biodiversity conservation - a short but essential read!
"Preventing extinction and maintaining nature’s contributions to people are not sufficiently closely aligned to be covered by a single apex target" https://t.co/mx2qiG4Dg0
RT @stubutchart: Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address prevent…
RT @stubutchart: Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address prevent…
RT @stubutchart: Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address prevent…
Sensible thoughts from @AndyPurvisNHM on the perils of a single apex target for conservation that tries to address preventing extinction & maintaining ecosystem services. 'When two goals lie in such different directions, you can’t kick one ball at both
RT @NHM_Science: Biodiversity: is a single target post 2020 desirable? Conserving biodiversity for its own sake/safeguarding ecosystem serv…
RT @NHM_Science: Biodiversity: is a single target post 2020 desirable? Conserving biodiversity for its own sake/safeguarding ecosystem serv…
RT @NHM_Science: Biodiversity: is a single target post 2020 desirable? Conserving biodiversity for its own sake/safeguarding ecosystem serv…
RT @NHM_Science: Biodiversity: is a single target post 2020 desirable? Conserving biodiversity for its own sake/safeguarding ecosystem serv…
RT @NHM_Science: Biodiversity: is a single target post 2020 desirable? Conserving biodiversity for its own sake/safeguarding ecosystem serv…
Biodiversity: is a single target post 2020 desirable? Conserving biodiversity for its own sake/safeguarding ecosystem services cannot both be achieved through a single target @AndyPurvisNHM @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/VfrfVcbHmy
RT @kimfriedmans: .#Post2020GBF single overarching ‘apex’ target or can you kick one ball at both ▶️safeguarding a huge range of benefits…
RT @kimfriedmans: .#Post2020GBF single overarching ‘apex’ target or can you kick one ball at both ▶️safeguarding a huge range of benefits…
.#Post2020GBF single overarching ‘apex’ target or can you kick one ball at both ▶️safeguarding a huge range of benefits for people; and ▶️prevent human-caused species extinction, because it is right to do so https://t.co/GYhtcnGViW https://t.co/auvtf7Eg68
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @erleellis: No Single Target Will Save Biodiversity HT @AndyPurvisNHM @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/nINIc99RaN
RT @erleellis: No Single Target Will Save Biodiversity HT @AndyPurvisNHM @NatureEcoEvo
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
No Single Target Will Save Biodiversity HT @AndyPurvisNHM @NatureEcoEvo
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @pedro_jordano: Conserving Biodiversity: an insightful analysis by @AndyPurvisNHM. We need aligned goals for preserving species contribu…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
Interesting thoughts, but a 25% reduction in all wild populations will essentially lead to extinction of all endangered species, according to thoughts like: https://t.co/XC45MqobiO
RT @pedro_jordano: Conserving Biodiversity: an insightful analysis by @AndyPurvisNHM. We need aligned goals for preserving species contribu…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @pedro_jordano: Conserving Biodiversity: an insightful analysis by @AndyPurvisNHM. We need aligned goals for preserving species contribu…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
Fascinating thinkpiece on the trade offs between prioritising zero extinctions and ecosystem services. Thanks @AndyPurvisNHM
RT @RichDGregory3: 1/2 Here @AndyPurvisNHM makes a compelling argument for the protection of local species abundance in terms of nature’s c…
RT @pedro_jordano: Conserving Biodiversity: an insightful analysis by @AndyPurvisNHM. We need aligned goals for preserving species contribu…
RT @pedro_jordano: Conserving Biodiversity: an insightful analysis by @AndyPurvisNHM. We need aligned goals for preserving species contribu…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @pedro_jordano: Conserving Biodiversity: an insightful analysis by @AndyPurvisNHM. We need aligned goals for preserving species contribu…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
Conserving Biodiversity: an insightful analysis by @AndyPurvisNHM. We need aligned goals for preserving species contributions to people AND preserving species from human-caused extinction. Don’t burn the books in the library of Life. It’s more than a singl
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
#biodiversity #conservation #massextinction from @NatureEcoEvo via @ipbes
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
RT @IPBES: New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex ta…
New @NatureEcoEvo article by #GlobalAssessment author @AndyPurvisNHM on #Biodiversity2020: "The idea of having a SINGLE apex target like the #ParisAgreement’s single 1.5°C target has recently gained momentum. I think this is a really bad idea." Access: h
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @hmlfpereira: Fully agree! Biodiversity change is multidimensional.
Thinking about local #biodiversity and #extinctions matters
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @CommsEarth: There are two fundamental drivers for the preservation of biodiversity and a single 'one size fits all' strategy may be det…
RT @CommsEarth: There are two fundamental drivers for the preservation of biodiversity and a single 'one size fits all' strategy may be det…
RT @CommsEarth: There are two fundamental drivers for the preservation of biodiversity and a single 'one size fits all' strategy may be det…
RT @RichDGregory3: 1/2 Here @AndyPurvisNHM makes a compelling argument for the protection of local species abundance in terms of nature’s c…
RT @CommsEarth: There are two fundamental drivers for the preservation of biodiversity and a single 'one size fits all' strategy may be det…
RT @hmlfpereira: Fully agree! Biodiversity change is multidimensional.
Fully agree! Biodiversity change is multidimensional.
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @RichDGregory3: 1/2 Here @AndyPurvisNHM makes a compelling argument for the protection of local species abundance in terms of nature’s c…
There are two fundamental drivers for the preservation of biodiversity and a single 'one size fits all' strategy may be detrimental to both. An intriguing World View article by @AndyPurvisNHM in @NatureEcoEvo https://t.co/UKGs1FDCsO
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
RT @NatureEcoEvo: A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people https://t.co/I7RGij0uWM new World View…
1/2 Here @AndyPurvisNHM makes a compelling argument for the protection of local species abundance in terms of nature’s contributions to people over global extinctions & shows why a single 'apex' target for biodiversity is so troublesome @ruthdavis27 @