↓ Skip to main content

The skin microbiome

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 2,887)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2375 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3562 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
The skin microbiome
Published in
Nature Reviews Microbiology, March 2011
DOI 10.1038/nrmicro2537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Grice, Julia A. Segre

Abstract

The skin is the human body's largest organ, colonized by a diverse milieu of microorganisms, most of which are harmless or even beneficial to their host. Colonization is driven by the ecology of the skin surface, which is highly variable depending on topographical location, endogenous host factors and exogenous environmental factors. The cutaneous innate and adaptive immune responses can modulate the skin microbiota, but the microbiota also functions in educating the immune system. The development of molecular methods to identify microorganisms has led to an emerging view of the resident skin bacteria as highly diverse and variable. An enhanced understanding of the skin microbiome is necessary to gain insight into microbial involvement in human skin disorders and to enable novel promicrobial and antimicrobial therapeutic approaches for their treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 35 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
France 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
India 3 <1%
Other 33 <1%
Unknown 3453 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 588 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 532 15%
Researcher 492 14%
Student > Master 398 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 157 4%
Other 508 14%
Unknown 887 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 852 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 506 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 377 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 252 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 129 4%
Other 459 13%
Unknown 987 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 783. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#25,111
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#17
of 2,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44
of 120,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.