| Title |
Comprehensive bycatch assessment in US fisheries for prioritizing management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-020-0506-9 |
| Authors |
Matthew S. Savoca, Stephanie Brodie, Heather Welch, Aimee Hoover, Lee R. Benaka, Steven J. Bograd, Elliott L. Hazen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 31% |
| Australia | 8 | 11% |
| Canada | 8 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Bangladesh | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 60% |
| Scientists | 28 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#751,295
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#487
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,568
of 374,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#30
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 127.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.