↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic and clinical impact of PD-L2 and PD-L1 expression in a cohort of 437 oesophageal cancers

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic and clinical impact of PD-L2 and PD-L1 expression in a cohort of 437 oesophageal cancers
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41416-020-0811-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuo Okadome, Yoshifumi Baba, Daichi Nomoto, Taisuke Yagi, Rebecca Kalikawe, Kazuto Harada, Yukiharu Hiyoshi, Yohei Nagai, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Shiro Iwagami, Yuji Miyamoto, Naoya Yoshida, Masayuki Watanabe, Yoshihiro Komohara, Takashi Shono, Yutaka Sasaki, Hideo Baba

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2020.
All research outputs
#9,766,277
of 17,379,776 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#7,755
of 9,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,519
of 276,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#71
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,379,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.