↓ Skip to main content

A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
150 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1153-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinichi Nakagawa, Adam G. Dunn, Malgorzata Lagisz, Alexandra Bannach-Brown, Eliza M. Grames, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Rose E. O’Dea, Daniel W. A. Noble, Martin J. Westgate, Pieter A. Arnold, Stuart Barrow, Alison Bethel, Eve Cooper, Yong Zhi Foo, Sonya R. Geange, Emily Hennessy, Witness Mapanga, Kerrie Mengersen, Claudia Munera, Matthew J. Page, Vivian Welch, Matthew Carter, Owen Forbes, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Charles T. Gray, W. Kyle Hamilton, Fonti Kar, Emily Kothe, Joey Kwong, Luke A. McGuinness, Paige Martin, Mandlenkosi Ngwenya, Christopher Penkin, Daniel Perez, Michael Schermann, Alistair M. Senior, Juan Vásquez, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Thomas E. White, Mitchell Whitelaw, Neal R. Haddaway

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 34%
Environmental Science 15 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 36 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#312,448
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#598
of 1,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,399
of 366,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#27
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 151.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.