The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-020-1153-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shinichi Nakagawa, Adam G. Dunn, Malgorzata Lagisz, Alexandra Bannach-Brown, Eliza M. Grames, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Rose E. O’Dea, Daniel W. A. Noble, Martin J. Westgate, Pieter A. Arnold, Stuart Barrow, Alison Bethel, Eve Cooper, Yong Zhi Foo, Sonya R. Geange, Emily Hennessy, Witness Mapanga, Kerrie Mengersen, Claudia Munera, Matthew J. Page, Vivian Welch, Neal R. Haddaway |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 12% |
| United States | 15 | 10% |
| Australia | 13 | 9% |
| Germany | 7 | 5% |
| Norway | 4 | 3% |
| South Africa | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 52% |
| Scientists | 59 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#389,500
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#722
of 2,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,260
of 394,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#30
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.