↓ Skip to main content

Neural population dynamics during reaching

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2071 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
Title
Neural population dynamics during reaching
Published in
Nature, June 2012
DOI 10.1038/nature11129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark M. Churchland, John P. Cunningham, Matthew T. Kaufman, Justin D. Foster, Paul Nuyujukian, Stephen I. Ryu, Krishna V. Shenoy

Abstract

Most theories of motor cortex have assumed that neural activity represents movement parameters. This view derives from what is known about primary visual cortex, where neural activity represents patterns of light. Yet it is unclear how well the analogy between motor and visual cortex holds. Single-neuron responses in motor cortex are complex, and there is marked disagreement regarding which movement parameters are represented. A better analogy might be with other motor systems, where a common principle is rhythmic neural activity. Here we find that motor cortex responses during reaching contain a brief but strong oscillatory component, something quite unexpected for a non-periodic behaviour. Oscillation amplitude and phase followed naturally from the preparatory state, suggesting a mechanistic role for preparatory neural activity. These results demonstrate an unexpected yet surprisingly simple structure in the population response. This underlying structure explains many of the confusing features of individual neural responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,071 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 56 3%
Germany 15 <1%
Japan 11 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
France 5 <1%
Chile 4 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Other 24 1%
Unknown 1935 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 629 30%
Researcher 413 20%
Student > Bachelor 182 9%
Student > Master 164 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 121 6%
Other 278 13%
Unknown 284 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 565 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 448 22%
Engineering 234 11%
Computer Science 105 5%
Psychology 100 5%
Other 283 14%
Unknown 336 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#419,494
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#20,339
of 98,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,896
of 179,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#209
of 981 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 981 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.