↓ Skip to main content

Regional records improve data quality in determining plant extinction rates

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Regional records improve data quality in determining plant extinction rates
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1146-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wesley M. Knapp, Anne Frances, Reed Noss, Robert F. C. Naczi, Alan Weakley, George D. Gann, Bruce G. Baldwin, James Miller, Patrick McIntyre, Brent D. Mishler, Gerry Moore, Richard G. Olmstead, Anna Strong, Daniel Gluesenkamp, Kathryn Kennedy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 31%
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 38%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,034,540
of 19,410,335 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1,114
of 1,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,076
of 279,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#45
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,410,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 155.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.