Béchamp or Pasteur? a Lost Chapter in the History of Biology

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 1924

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 5 X users
wikipedia: 2 Wikipedia pages

video: 1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley: 9 Mendeley

Summary X Wikipedia YouTube

So far, Altmetric has seen 5 X posts from 5 X users, with an upper bound of 18,166 followers.

@MissytheMuse @ValZimmer2 @SwaledaleMutton @Horatioyuletide @CoralBlob @Mr_Magoo5 Lots of things are documented but aren’t true - such as Bechamp’s theories https://t.co/E1mnrfetg7

30 Jul 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

@TNTgrupa @Jovana1244 I ja sam ANTIVAKSER i reći ću ti da je to spinovanje “vakcine su spasile čovečanstvo” samo prazna priča puna nebuloza .. evo malo štiva a kad to pročitaš, nadji tekstove Dr. Stefan Lanka.. sve je lepo objasnjeno. https://t.co/KskUeSC

19 Jun 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

excellent book

07 May 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @doofgeek4011: https://t.co/cWKIvST5E0 https://t.co/eCTvfujG7v "Béchamp or Pasteur? a Lost Chapter in the History of Biology" has been…

17 Jul 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

https://t.co/cWKIvST5E0 https://t.co/eCTvfujG7v "Béchamp or Pasteur? a Lost Chapter in the History of Biology" has been largely discredited as inaccurate...." The author has utilised a fair part of the book to exploit her own antimicrobic and antivaccina

16 Jul 2021

Reply Repost Favourite