↓ Skip to main content

Béchamp or Pasteur? a Lost Chapter in the History of Biology

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 1924
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Béchamp or Pasteur? a Lost Chapter in the History of Biology
Published in
Nature, January 1924
DOI 10.1038/113121b0
Authors

W. B.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 33%
Student > Master 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,785,902
of 25,243,120 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#57,712
of 97,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.