@alphaarchitect (1/2) Interestingly, this extends to some of the decision-making processes behind ESG... https://t.co/VCoTedEUVn https://t.co/yzCotnlouY
@MartinMay678 So weisen Ergebnisse auf einen Interessenskonfilikt hin: zw. persönlicher Interesse des Einzelnen, sich eine Meinung zu bilden, die mit der Meinung anderer übereinstimmt und dem kollektiven Interesse die Wissenschafts für's Gemeinwohl zu nutz
@tomowenmorgan Interesting study on a related topic: https://t.co/VCoTedEUVn
@ProfRayWills I studied physics - before you! I spent high school during the GLOBAL COOLING propaganda years, so I have a VERY precise recollection of the sequence of events! I'm on the HIGHLY EDUCATED sign who just can't take your scam seriously! https://
RT @KHayhoe: @jdaviescoates Yes. My book Saving Us has a very extensive bibliography so that's the top reference I'd recommend. But here ar…
@jdaviescoates Yes. My book Saving Us has a very extensive bibliography so that's the top reference I'd recommend. But here are a few places to get started: 1/ https://t.co/FL3NwriIRZ 2/ https://t.co/XJ1A8dNZAb 3/ https://t.co/SHwU3GYuQa
@MadalinaDay @techonomy Yes. A few sources: 1/ https://t.co/XJ1A8dNZAb 2/ https://t.co/FL3NwriIRZ 3/ https://t.co/cAl014F7LL
@THESMAR85422061 @techonomy Truth, and it's peer-reviewed. https://t.co/FL3NwriIRZ
147/ "Polarization becomes larger as science literacy & numeracy increase. "We also analyzed subjects' perceptions of nuclear-power risks. Here, too, the gap between became larger as scientific literacy and numeracy increased." https://t.co/VCoTedEUV
@skdh Sorry but no. The knowledge deficit model has been beaten to death decades ago in the social science literature. Here is the nature paper: https://t.co/FL3NwriIRZ and my science essay: https://t.co/Tz687YBOZh. and here is my Global Weirding episode:
RT @KHayhoe: @MarkNico4 That's a common misconception that includes a variant of the "blame the scientists" motif. You're assuming the Know…
RT @KHayhoe: @MarkNico4 That's a common misconception that includes a variant of the "blame the scientists" motif. You're assuming the Know…
RT @KHayhoe: @MarkNico4 That's a common misconception that includes a variant of the "blame the scientists" motif. You're assuming the Know…
@MarkNico4 That's a common misconception that includes a variant of the "blame the scientists" motif. You're assuming the Knowledge Deficit Model applies here, but it does not; not to climate change and not to any other polarized topics. https://t.co/FL3Nw
@icarus62 @PeterEvans1138 @dantappin @DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @hausfath @rahmstorf @antonioguterres @UNEP @UNFCCC @IPCC_CH The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co/rGMjKdVVBH TRANSLATION: when yo
If you are unfortunate enough to have to get your information from the news media, at least watch news from both sides of the political spectrum. (People are really good at motivated reasoning!)
@JulesBywaterLee @BrandtGui @wideawake_media The scientifically highly educated, like me, do not believe in the climate fearmongering - because we can see that it's a complete fraud. These morons try to frame it as a matter of "conflict of interest" with Z
RT @blob_hunt: @curryja Not the first time this has been shown. This study decided to blame cultural factors for the scientifically literat…
@curryja Not the first time this has been shown. This study decided to blame cultural factors for the scientifically literate being less concerned about climate change. https://t.co/Q82mFNFplp https://t.co/YrQE45E660
@MikeHudema Scientifically literate, highly educated people like me (I studied physics and IT, unlike Harrison Ford!) DO NOT BUY THE LIES because there is NO EVIDENCE to support the fearmongering! https://t.co/aYCaXyQ6NB https://t.co/ygxOCI2JrJ
@chrisklomp Dat is de vraag of dat zo is. https://t.co/XIkZiVeASX
▼2023年度早稲田大学基幹理工・創造理工・先進理工学部[2月16日実施]Part-1-Text-1出典 Dan M. Kahan (et. al), The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks, 27 May 2012 https://t.co/uyKiqKQwbv #入試問題出典分析 #2023年度大学入試
@ECOWARRIORSS Ah, people like me, scientifically educated with extensive knowledge and access to all SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS are the real problem - they can't lie to us 😂 The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change r
@DrEliDavid When they can't win through lies and pseudo-science, they try to win through mobbing and lies... https://t.co/Wq2cyhcIRU Their greatest problem are the highly educated who refuse to accept pseudo-science without evidence. https://t.co/OnwOJ8c
@ejwwest AGW is Lysenkoism! The promoters: - lie intentionally - hide data - cherry pick data - don't acknowledge error - use buddy reviews - attack those who disagree - try to pathologize disagreement - are extremely ideological & Marxist https://t.c
77/ Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co/VCoTedVXXn
@GuiXimEnEs No contexto das mudanças climáticas, em q visões ideológicas têm peso, o aumento do conhecimento factual sobre o tema até *intensifica* a polarização (os conservadores mobilizam o conhecimento pra negar ainda mais firmemente). https://t.co/WLRs
RT @ReformedTrader: 1/ Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks (Kahan et al.) "Those with the…
RT @Knutti_ETH: 6/ But it's not just about explaining facts. People with higher sci. literacy are *not* more concerned about climate change…
RT @Knutti_ETH: 6/ But it's not just about explaining facts. People with higher sci. literacy are *not* more concerned about climate change…
RT @Knutti_ETH: 6/ But it's not just about explaining facts. People with higher sci. literacy are *not* more concerned about climate change…
Præcis! Højreorienterede har en interesse i at frikende “det frie marked” i forhold til klimaforandringer! #dkpol
6/ But it's not just about explaining facts. People with higher sci. literacy are *not* more concerned about climate change, just more polarized. Concern about climate change is predicted mostly by values, political left/right, and by those who we trust. h
57/ "Highly numerate people (like the super-brainy audience at the Amazing Meeting, an annual gathering of people who love scientific reasoning) score just as badly on our fact questions as everyone else." (p. 187) More on this: https://t.co/VCoTedVXXn
98/ "We jump to conclusions, then stick to them. We think we base opinions on evidence, but the evidence/interpretations we consider are partially distorted to fit initial snap judgments. This maintains the coherence of the existing story in our minds." ht
@PaulCareyJones That study took that graph (with unlabeled x-axis? how tf did this get published?!) from this paywalled study: https://t.co/XzbGZlo2Fe
@jmcrookston Kahan et al should learn to label their ****ing x-axis - no point having a 95% confidence interval without that!. The study that you've taken this screenshot from links to this study as "Kahan et al" - https://t.co/XzbGZlo2Fe - can anyone with
18/ Related reading: Media Slant is Contagious https://t.co/qhfJmU66Xc Is Newspaper Coverage of Economic Events Politically Biased? https://t.co/wLln3sNPkN Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co
10/ Related reading: Unsettled https://t.co/ASQ0bH8jPg Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co/VCoTedVXXn
RT @ellenpetersjdm: 2/ It’s intuitive to think that people higher in cognitive ability would be less biased, but people can use ability to…
RT @ellenpetersjdm: 2/ It’s intuitive to think that people higher in cognitive ability would be less biased, but people can use ability to…
2/ It’s intuitive to think that people higher in cognitive ability would be less biased, but people can use ability to support existing viewpoints. Before, we found that those with higher numeric ability reported more politically biased risk perceptions ht
And in case this thread wasn't already long enough, I'll note that this has always been my misgiving about the practical conclusions drawn by the Cultural Cognition Project research on climate change denial. https://t.co/syFoP7l9uq
@andrew_boarder @KA_Nicholas @lunduniversity @ylld Very unfortunately that is not true here. That idea is something known as "the knowledge deficit model" and it's been proven to fail on highly polarized topics like climate. Read: https://t.co/FL3NwriIRZ a
RT @JuhaItkonen: Esimerkkinä ilmiöstä: tässä tutkimuksessa havaittiin, että USA:ssa fiksuimpien ilmastohuolet eivät suinkaan olleet paremmi…
Esimerkkinä ilmiöstä: tässä tutkimuksessa havaittiin, että USA:ssa fiksuimpien ilmastohuolet eivät suinkaan olleet paremmin linjassa tieteen kanssa, vaan jyrkemmin polarisoituneita niin, että ne istuivat paremmin omaan ideologiaan. https://t.co/uMMB8F5jiC
@punkbiology de sua posição em relação às mudanças climáticas do que o letramento científico. https://t.co/z6VyDFOZqh A questão é como alcançar essas pessoas. O Kahan costuma falar que uma mesma pessoa não pode alcanãr todos, o ideal seria uma comunidade d
71/ "Sowell refers to A Conflict of Visions as his favorite book he's written." Sowell: ”People similarly well-informed & well-meaning reach opposite conclusions. ”The book tries to show the implied assumptions behind conflicts.” (p. 154) More on th
For instance, those with more political conservative values who have more scientific literacy rate climate change risk significantly lower than those with more egalitarian liberal values. https://t.co/CSNSb8Nu5v
RT @ReformedTrader: 1/ Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks (Kahan et al.) "Those with the…
15/ Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co/VCoTedVXXn
18/ Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co/VCoTedVXXn
186/ Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co/VCoTedVXXn
85/ Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co/VCoTedVXXn
1/ Polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks (Kahan et al.) "Those with the most science literacy & reasoning capacity were not most concerned about climate change; they were the group w/ the most polarizatio
RT @rmtakata: @riebeckite_ Já tem um tempo em que o fenômeno é constatado. Como no caso do aquecimento global. Mas tem interação com outros…
@riebeckite_ Já tem um tempo em que o fenômeno é constatado. Como no caso do aquecimento global. Mas tem interação com outros fatores. Vide, e.g. https://t.co/JEecwpQYU5
RT @rudybouma: Antwoord: de eerste keer krijgen ze te horen dat het een links protest is, de tweede keer dat het een rechtse demonstratie i…
RT @rudybouma: Antwoord: de eerste keer krijgen ze te horen dat het een links protest is, de tweede keer dat het een rechtse demonstratie i…
RT @rudybouma: Antwoord: de eerste keer krijgen ze te horen dat het een links protest is, de tweede keer dat het een rechtse demonstratie i…
RT @rudybouma: Antwoord: de eerste keer krijgen ze te horen dat het een links protest is, de tweede keer dat het een rechtse demonstratie i…
Antwoord: de eerste keer krijgen ze te horen dat het een links protest is, de tweede keer dat het een rechtse demonstratie is. De politieke voorkeur van de proefpersonen bepaalt hoe ze het gedrag interpreteren. https://t.co/fz7EZm17HA
@mjantti @Tasapainoilija Yhtäläisyydet ovat toki olemassa riippumatta siitä, miten ne vaikuttavat tieteenalamme arvostukseen. Mutta miten se on harhaanjohtava? Psykologiset mekanismit ja motiivit ovat uskoakseni samanlaiset. Huomasitko myös tämän haaran: h
RT @JuhaItkonen: @filsdeproust Iso oivallus kirjallisuudessa on ollut, että vika ei ole tiedon tai ymmärryksen puutteessa, vaan taustalla o…
@filsdeproust Iso oivallus kirjallisuudessa on ollut, että vika ei ole tiedon tai ymmärryksen puutteessa, vaan taustalla on erilaiset sosiaaliset, kulttuuriset ja taloudelliset motiivit. Fiksut ihmiset ovat jopa taitavampi selittämään tieteen mieleisekseen
@FleerackersA Yes! Dan Kahan’s fascinating work on cultural cognition. Long story short- for conservatives literacy backfires when it comes to climate change: https://t.co/xLDGLAr1OI
@AdrienGazouille @paulinemski @MrPourquoi Si c'était une question d'éducation, les gens les plus éduqués seraient ceux qui ont le plus confiance dans les résultats de la science. Or... non. https://t.co/HsEEujicgX
One thing that will complicate centrist discourses on misinformation and facts: there’s actual research on this already, and it contradicts most of the takes. Spoiler: it’s not just a problem of misinformation. https://t.co/PtkL9qfABp https://t.co/rgOg
@Greg_AG @NateSilver538 Science literacy can predict polarised views on climate change, not concern as might be expected. https://t.co/QHwqR85JLZ
RT @celia_du_: 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 https://t.co/gBhLpUBzYQ
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
RT @damico_dana: @Exostrologist @Constababble A fave paper to cite, explaining that comprehension deficit is not usually the reason for res…
RT @damico_dana: @Exostrologist @Constababble A fave paper to cite, explaining that comprehension deficit is not usually the reason for res…
@kristinapistone I also cite this one a lot. Nature! https://t.co/FL3NwriIRZ
@JoshuaGrubbsPhD https://t.co/4pkUjV4jPa by @matt_nurse @willozap and https://t.co/4vVJgjqmep by @cult_cognition have evidence for this among those most numerate. But also see https://t.co/2LQMaiMoyB by @Ben_Tappin et al. for some contradictory evidence
A couple months back I found a couple relevant papers to the discussion of individualism vs collectivism, and how these relate to science & health https://t.co/FWQ2C6Kbp5 https://t.co/psm78u8hX0
@tarahaelle Don't get me started on this, but I think work from Kahan and Peters on numeracy, motivated reasoning, and group loyalty informs how really smart folks can explain things to see and others. https://t.co/fIMho7JAjc
@HuetSylvestre Le danger est de tomber dans la théorie du déficit, et penser que pour que les gens adoptent le bon comportement, il suffit qu'on leur explique mieux. Pour tout type de sujet, il a été démontré que c'était globalement faux, ex: https://t.co/
e.g. 1 .people’s support for climate change is strongly affected by the extent to which they agree with individualism (a belief that government should avoid affecting individual choice), even controlling for their education level https://t.co/962K6nTYXd.
@yboulanger2 @bio_diverse Isn't it also possible that distrust in environmental experts is due to underlying value conflicts rather than lack of scientific training? We know that science literacy is associated with more polarization on scientific topics.
"Members of the public with the highest degrees of science literacy and technical reasoning capacity were not the most concerned about climate change. Rather, they were the ones among whom cultural polarization was greatest." https://t.co/tz2CzR1hxC
@mrjoedixon @ClarkeMicah Not true - studies show that high levels of scientific literacy was polarising in the climate debate, I.e. those with strongest views on climate (mainstream or sceptic) had highest levels of sci literacy. See Kahan et al https://t.
RT @Michael_Cobb68: I've explained this aspect of public opinion to anyone who normatively believes education is THE cure for "ignorance" a…
RT @Michael_Cobb68: I've explained this aspect of public opinion to anyone who normatively believes education is THE cure for "ignorance" a…
I've explained this aspect of public opinion to anyone who normatively believes education is THE cure for "ignorance" about #ClimateChange. PID polarizes knowledge. The most scientifically literate and engaged GOP voters are the most in denial about CC h
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks https://t.co/J7st8Rh1Xp via @instapaper